Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm wondering too. The only thing that comes immediately to mind is adjusting your pants in the crotch area, which, well, sometimes it's uncomfortable without there being any sort of excitement, and it's just a matter of comfort. Like pulling your underwear out of your but. If that's an example of what's being referred to, it's really, really unfortunate, because it's a matter of one party acting totally innocently (…
That's not what I was thinking, no, and it's a little weird that you immediately guessed it was something that you don't believe is an actual problem. Like, you didn't even wait for me to answer the question before deciding my answer was likely to be something bogus.
Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
251–258 of 258 posts
Re: Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by "men are psychologically torturing women just by enacting common male body movement patterns in the workplace" ?
This will probably be detached for being off-topic, but until then... Men and women move in very different ways due to gender policing. Things like how much you are allowed to/required to move your hips side to side are different for men and women. Sometimes in the workplace women are put in positions of less influence and less pay. They experience repeated instances of being passed over, thwarted, harassed, etc, whi…
I'm also an ally - I call out male coworkers who talk over or interrupt my female coworkers. And if a group of male coworkers get too "bro-y", even without women around, I'm the villain to say "yo dude, don't be sexist", and not back down from the "It's just a joke" defense. I'm a software engineer and I regularly introspect about how I can take active steps to make my environment more welcoming to women engineers.
I say all this to give you SOME of my beliefs before I say the next thing as un-insultingly as I possibly can.
The stuff you are talking about is a step too far, and it actively actively harms the cause of progressive feminism by making it seem frivolous, and immature. There is real harassment going on all around us, active/aggressive, and passive/insideous. But the way people WALK? Are you kidding me right now? I am an ally with my words and my actions. I will not change the way I walk because it signifies my maleness to a sensitive little wallflower who apparently feels powerless in front of 50% of the visible population?
I hate the "#notallmen" hashtag because it was reactionary and distracting from women who were at the time trying to speak real truth about their experiences. It misses just as much of the point as "All Lives matter".
But in the case of your example, a woman who is being harassed at work surely does not assume that all men in her workplace are against her by default, on account of their maleness. If she does, it has more to do with how they treat her, and not how they walk through the office.
Re: Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
So every sub is vote manipulating by nature of being a group that votes together on specific posts? I see. Don't break the site from the sidebar would have been a better option.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his internet-ego depends on his not understanding it." If you refuse to see the distinction between vote-manipulation and organic vote behavior, then I think we're done here.
If you refuse to see that I simply disagree with the fact their stickying constitutes vote-manipulation, and assume I'm arguing in bad faith because I don't hold the same viewpoint as you, then I think we're done here.
Re: Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
How would one PGP sign their post that prevent malicious editing after the fact?
If someone else edited your post, the signature would no longer be valid. So the attacker could remove the signature or sign it with a different key or leave it alone and hope no one notices, but they couldn't re-sign with your key since they wouldn't have access to your private key file. Public key cryptography is really neat if you haven't played around with it before. I was being half-facetious, but if you want to…
Are you meaning a feature of the site that let's you sign your post with your key as opposed to pasting your public key in the post?
Re: Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someone else edited your post, the signature would no longer be valid. So the attacker could remove the signature or sign it with a different key or leave it alone and hope no one notices, but they couldn't re-sign with your key since they wouldn't have access to your private key file. Public key cryptography is really neat if you haven't played around with it before. I was being half-facetious, but if you want to…
I still don't understand. If the edit left the public key as I left it, how would anyone know the difference? Are you meaning a feature of the site that let's you sign your post with your key as opposed to pasting your public key in the post?
Re: Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
I still don't understand. If the edit left the public key as I left it, how would anyone know the difference? Are you meaning a feature of the site that let's you sign your post with your key as opposed to pasting your public key in the post?
You don't just post your public key next to your comment, you use your private key to create a cryptographic signature of the contents of your post. Anyone with your public key can check that the signature is valid. Altering the text will cause that signature check to fail.
So in theory, yes. But in practice - people are too lazy to validate or check the key (if the attacker replaces it with their own signed message) for every single post. This is a bigger issue the more users you have signing messages - as users begin getting lazier with checking each and every signed message.
Unless they are under a lot of eyeballs from people who do care. If Wikileaks "signs" a message and it doesn't verify or wasn't with their key - a lot of people will call it out. If I "sign" a message or use a different private key (very possible that I sign with the wrong key when I have multiples) - I doubt anyone would call me out on it.
Re: Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
#257Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by "men are psychologically torturing women just by enacting common male body movement patterns in the workplace" ?
This will probably be detached for being off-topic, but until then... Men and women move in very different ways due to gender policing. Things like how much you are allowed to/required to move your hips side to side are different for men and women. Sometimes in the workplace women are put in positions of less influence and less pay. They experience repeated instances of being passed over, thwarted, harassed, etc, whi…
Re: Reddit overhauls upvote algorithm to thwart cheaters
#258Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the users Spez trolled with his edits decided to leave reddit forever, it would only make reddit a better place.
I agree, but there are other users who might not trust that their comments won't be invisibly altered. The specific incident is not very troubling, but the fact that it occurred at all is.