Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes - I'm doing about 33K per month on a SaaS that is just Rails/Postgres/Heroku - the only javascript is some basic JQuery.
Amateur. I make about 35k/month using only bash via CGI and some plain text files as database.
Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
271–280 of 343 posts
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really you should not be checking length at all. There is no such thing as a password which is "too long."
From a password security standpoint, I largely agree. You can open yourself to system attacks by allowing arbitrary length input. You should have some kind of limits on any user input.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#273Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
And of course, that very page railing against Javascript overcomplexity itself loads 400 KB of script bundles.
400 kb is considered super lean these days...
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that is accurate and the number is based on 7 days of revenue at about $500 per day average this smells a lot like growth hacking nonsense.
Nonsense on stilts. Extrapolating $3500 in your first week of media-driven traffic into a $15k/mo run rate is ridiculous. Calling it "AI-powered" is a whopper too.
If the interview is to be believed, almost anything you consider "AI-powered" is within one degree of what is happening here. At least on a conceptual level.
AI doesn't need to be magic, it just needs to be making decisions :)
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's hard to see a subscription model for logo designs though. It's not like you need a new logo each month.
Funny, some designers have actually reached out asking about a subscription for their studio
That time they could save is likely much more valuable than just the one time fee, and constant improvements and features for them could very well justify a nice recurring subscription fee.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nonsense on stilts. Extrapolating $3500 in your first week of media-driven traffic into a $15k/mo run rate is ridiculous. Calling it "AI-powered" is a whopper too.
Extrapolation aside, making decisions automatically based off of incoming data points _is_ AI. If the interview is to be believed, almost anything you consider "AI-powered" is within one degree of what is happening here. At least on a conceptual level. AI doesn't need to be magic, it just needs to be making decisions :)
You're stretching the term to the point that it no longer holds any meaning.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nonsense on stilts. Extrapolating $3500 in your first week of media-driven traffic into a $15k/mo run rate is ridiculous. Calling it "AI-powered" is a whopper too.
Extrapolation aside, making decisions automatically based off of incoming data points _is_ AI. If the interview is to be believed, almost anything you consider "AI-powered" is within one degree of what is happening here. At least on a conceptual level. AI doesn't need to be magic, it just needs to be making decisions :)
Without making a solid distinction there, people are going to start calling PID temperature controllers "AI"
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#279Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#280I'm curious about how the $15k/mo figure is computed. The story reads as though Logojoy more or less launched on Producthunt, which was 7 days ago. And all posts on the blog are dated Nov 15th. Finally the domain itself seems to have been listed on HugeDomains as of Oct 8th [1]. Now maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like the revenue figure is extrapolated from a small window which includes a wave of initial t…
Feel like IndieHacker isn't requiring any proof of revenue. Does anyone know what, if any, fact checking process Indie Hackers has to verify the claims by made by a startup?