Live data from Hacker News

Inside Magic Leap

forbes.com

21–30 of 220 posts

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We're going to make augmented reality everything ! Repair manuals, etc" Bullshit. You're going to model and diagram every part and repair guide from every production model vehicle ever? Magic Leap would need a software development industry unto itself to build the solutions being batted lightly about in the OP like pingpong balls

I'm skeptical too, but I could envision a path where this gets a lot of the work done at a tooling level. All these products will have CAD models behind them already, AutoCad and SolidWorks, et al, could introduce tooling to pump out the assets necessary for this at not-terrible levels of effort, couldn't they?

Sure, and there are already standards for exporting 3d geometry data.

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#23
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We're going to make augmented reality everything ! Repair manuals, etc" Bullshit. You're going to model and diagram every part and repair guide from every production model vehicle ever? Magic Leap would need a software development industry unto itself to build the solutions being batted lightly about in the OP like pingpong balls

I think that having an (the) entire industry writing solutions for Magic Leap is exactly what they are envisioning. It would be a platform, i.e. Chilton would build an app for it. Now, whether or not they are actually going to be the biggest thing in graphical interfaces since the flat screen is another question...

There's just no way.

They aren't going to beat Oculus/FB, or Sony, or HTC.

They don't have a product; they clearly must have some incredible tech demos, and a wizard working VC

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#25
I saw some video from Magic Leap some time ago, some animated character got behind the chair in augmented vr. Aren't they just using infrared to get distance to object, then they are using ML to classify and distinct them all, then when they have sizes of object they calculate behind which element their character will be so they can position it good and make parts of it transparent while crossing under the chair?

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We're going to make augmented reality everything ! Repair manuals, etc" Bullshit. You're going to model and diagram every part and repair guide from every production model vehicle ever? Magic Leap would need a software development industry unto itself to build the solutions being batted lightly about in the OP like pingpong balls

I'm skeptical too, but I could envision a path where this gets a lot of the work done at a tooling level. All these products will have CAD models behind them already, AutoCad and SolidWorks, et al, could introduce tooling to pump out the assets necessary for this at not-terrible levels of effort, couldn't they?

The process isn't rocket science but the scale is.

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#27
post #20

Ok - it seems that they 'absolutely' have something bewildering, and eye-popping. There are enough 'no information' testimonials by smart people to get that. BUT I'm still pretty weary of billions getting pumped into a business that remains unproven. + Maybe development is very expensive + Maybe the goggles cost to much + Maybe they just don't have quite enough content to justify the high costs + Maybe the experience…

I remember that we were going to revamp existing cities and build new cities in accordance to this wonderful transportation device that would change everything, of which I cannot recall the name. I currently see them used as joke props in movies.

If you include 'hover-boards' these battery powered, two wheeled, self balancing, things sold over 2.5 million of the things in just the USA in 2015. So, it really is becoming increasingly widespread.

You can see this as and extension of the skateboards vs scooters vertical stick argument.

PS: For comparson 17.5 million cars where sold in 2015 and 12.5 million bikes with 20+" wheels.

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#28
I'm thinking that Hololens rev. 2 will be out before Magic Leap rev. 1 is out and will be cheaper. So unless Magic Leap is an order of magnitude better than Hololens, they have failed.

Say what you will about Microsoft, at least they already have a platform on which this "new era of computing" can be based: Windows. That is to say, it makes tremendous more sense to evolve from what we have now into the "new era of computing", than to write an entire platform from scratch, which is what I assume Magic Leap is trying to do.

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#29
post #27
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember that we were going to revamp existing cities and build new cities in accordance to this wonderful transportation device that would change everything, of which I cannot recall the name. I currently see them used as joke props in movies.

If you include 'hover-boards' these battery powered, two wheeled, self balancing, things sold over 2.5 million of the things in just the USA in 2015. So, it really is becoming increasingly widespread. You can see this as and extension of the skateboards vs scooters vertical stick argument. PS: For comparson 17.5 million cars where sold in 2015 and 12.5 million bikes with 20+" wheels.

[deleted]

Re: Inside Magic Leap

#30

Magic Leap has been bleeding talent as a result of their relocating from the Bay Area to Florida [1]. As I understand it, this decision was made by and for one of their (independently wealthy) founders. [1] http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/careers/fl-magic-leap-n...

This article brings up a big issue: even if Magic Leap fails to deliver, they just might own all of the relevant patents. This could make AR needlessly expensive for decades.
Post reply on HN