Live data from Hacker News

The Killer Cats Are Winning

nybooks.com

121–130 of 139 posts

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#121
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Certainly. So what should humans do about the cats?

Get out of the way and let cats solve the problem! We're the problem, let them solve us!

I love comments like this for reminding me to do something more productive with my life.

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#122
post #5

And a counterpoint http://www.npr.org/2016/04/04/473002208/facing-a-growing-rat... That example is why cats were domesticated in the first place. Not having a healthy predator prey relationship in areas leads to public health issues.

Not having a healthy predator prey relationship in areas leads to public health issues

I wonder what could be released in a dense city like New York to take care of the rat problem. Bats? Snakes? It's a comical thought, but so far there's no real solution.

The only healthy relationship we've found so far is that of rats to poison, but the rats seem to be winning that battle given their ubiquitousness!

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#124

You'd ask yourself just how diverse the wildlife in an urban environment is, where the bulk of domestic cats live. Right now I'm not convinced about the ecological impact.

Cat's don't just live in urban environments. The article says most of the damage is done by ferals.

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#125
post #4

It's worth reading the author's actual peer reviewed paper: http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2380

This is a systematic review derived from existing work.

While the models they use are fairly conservative, it seems like figure 2 is pretty telling. 50% of the variance in their estimates comes from the "Unowned cats" parameter - a parameter with which "no empirically derived data exist".

IMO think they are reaching too far on this - but it is a nice elegant, simple study. I look forward to following the letters re: this pub.

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#126
post #33

> This is a ridiculous point to waffle on: pet cats should no more be allowed to roam around at will than should pet dogs, horses, pythons, or pot-bellied pigs. Actually, my Dad grew up on a mountain where, every day after school, he would come home and gather up the pig and cows that had been let free to eat for the day. So there's certainly use cases for letting a pig roam free and gather some forage. By the time I…

Uh, the fantasy world your dad described is not the real world. Cows are one thing, they are too big to lose except perhaps in India, but do you have any idea what environmental damage is being done by feral pigs that were "let free to eat for the day' and never came back? If you want to domesticate an animal to work for you, then you take responsibility for it and all it does, plain and simple. Eventually we will us…

> It should not be too surprising what apex predators like cats (we make them tiny, but they are at the top of the food chain nonetheless) can do to ecosystems if crazy people (us) confuse them with cuddly toys and breed and feed them without control.

Just for nitpicking: How can they be "apex predators" "at the top of the food chain" when they're eaten by coyotes e.g.?

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've heard multiple stories on this theme: a farm cat that's lived out in the barn and fields for years, often not particularly concerned with humans, one day decides to hang it up and "retire" to a comfortable old age being a cozy house cat. I find this behavior to be so absolutely fascinating .

Not to dispirit you but the idea that mammals get lazier as they get older is a mighty low bar for fascination

It's not the laziness that is interesting, it's how the cat responds to it: by actively choosing to "retire" indoors among the humans as a house cat. Do you know of any other animal that does something like this?

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't work. My cat who died a couple of years ago at the age of 16 had a bell on his collar all his life. I couldn't pick that bell up without it tinkling but Radar could walk from one end of the house to the other, including the stairs, without a sound. Also when hunting he did most of it by waiting for his prey to get close enough so that any noise from the bell was simply the last sound they heard. For a while h…

Countering your anecdotal evidence with some of my own: it works fine for many, many cats. Even if the success rate is <100%, it's worth doing.

Can you be sure? I've read before how cats learn to adapt to this very easily. Just because the bell is tingling when you're around and the cat doesn't care, doesn't mean it hinders its hunting.

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, the hard part is just that cats have different motivations than dogs. Dogs will do something just because they know you want them to do it and you are above them in the pack. They are also more likely to be food motivated. One of my cats is very food motivated. She will always come running for the word "treat". One of them is extremely not food motivated. He gets excited when I say treat because the other cats…

"Dogs will do something just because they know you want them to do it and you are above them in the pack. They are also more likely to be food motivated." Dr. John Pilley, who trained his dog Chaser to learn over 1000 words and even syntax (like the difference between "To ball take Frisbee" and "To Frisbee take ball")[1], said Chaser is best motivated by play. "My last words to the class were to remind them that play…

Some dogs are more reward-motivated (not necessarily food - some like to be pet more), others are motivated by pleasing the owners. But either way, dogs are better conditioned to obey commands for the sake of something they like. Not really surprising, since that's what we've been selectively breeding them for, unlike cats.

Re: The Killer Cats Are Winning

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's exactly like saying humans ought to only live in the savannah of Africa as hunters and gatherers. Just because that's where humans evolved doesn't mean that that is the only way they are "supposed" to live, nor is where they are "happiest". For starters, humans in civilization and indoor cats live a heck of a lot longer and don't have to worry about getting eaten by predators.

Our modern ways of living, sedentary, often little visceral excitement, control by overlords and paperwork and rules do lead to an awful lot of depression and anomie. Why do you think so many people are unhappy? Indoor cats have that without any of the benefits. It's not as black and white as you paint it

> Indoor cats have that without any of the benefits.

You mean, except for significantly reduced exposure to diseases and prompt care for any health issues that do arise, better food, and risk free entertainment?

Based on the average life expectancy alone, an indoor cat has a lot of benefits.

Post reply on HN