I’m not convinced that the task switcher needs to exist. Since apps in the task switcher aren’t really running, the task switcher isn’t so much a task switcher as it is a list of recently used apps The task switcher lets you switch back and forth between apps one handed using your thumb. I think that's part of the rationale for it. Also, the Least Recently Used algorithm will dynamically make a short list of the actu…
iPhone OS 4.0
31–40 of 67 posts
Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stinks?! Really? Apple have done a pretty good job of backporting features where it makes sense to do so.
Well Id like to upgrade to the 3gs and I do so for $200, but only way I can get a 3gs due to cellphone contract is pay $500 or more. Which is the cost of the iPad, which does not makes sense. Is Apple saying after 4 years of the iPhone in production the cost to manufacture both the iPhone & iPad are the same? Bullcrap AT&T/Apple!
Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#33Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#34Apple's approach is closer to a folder metaphor than Lukas's. http://goo.gl/NMhl
Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#35Android has an almost-identical "task switcher" (press and hold the Home button to show a popup of recent apps). I don't think anyone I know uses it regularly - and I just spent 18 months working in a 30-person Android software company.
Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#36I’m not convinced that the task switcher needs to exist. Since apps in the task switcher aren’t really running, the task switcher isn’t so much a task switcher as it is a list of recently used apps The task switcher lets you switch back and forth between apps one handed using your thumb. I think that's part of the rationale for it. Also, the Least Recently Used algorithm will dynamically make a short list of the actu…
It'll be interesting to see if the older phones get this. As you say it can function as a recently used list, even if those apps are not running, the user shouldn't have to care about the distinction.
Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#37Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#38Apple's approach is closer to a folder metaphor than Lukas's. http://goo.gl/NMhl
So you're saying real-world folders switch around the positions of their contents when you open them? :-)
Although, I've had instances when handling bulky folders and moving them around, the top most documents would get accidentally rearranged! ;-)
Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you're saying real-world folders switch around the positions of their contents when you open them? :-)
That would be confusing! Not at all. I'm simply saying your take is a lot like a popover and think that Apple's implementation though not perfect, is closer to a folder. Actually, to be exact they should have really called it "Drawers" because that's how their animated and in a drawer, contents do indeed get shuffled around! Although, I've had instances when handling bulky folders and moving them around, the top most…
Re: iPhone OS 4.0
#40Android has an almost-identical "task switcher" (press and hold the Home button to show a popup of recent apps). I don't think anyone I know uses it regularly - and I just spent 18 months working in a 30-person Android software company.
Android uses a separate and almost useless alphabetically-sorted application's drawer. You are able to put applications on the home screens, but chances are that you are messing with an application that you don't use very frequently and thus have not placed it onto a home screen. In addition, on stock Android (not rooted/jailbroken), you only have 3 home screens.