Live data from Hacker News

Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

mercurynews.com

151–160 of 397 posts

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#151
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More black people .

Give it a rest. Trumpeting your PC nonsense won't help you. You understood what he meant. Communication successful, despite your protest!

It's not about successful communication, it's about how you present an entire group of people. Using the term "the blacks" or "Blacks" makes you sound like Archie Bunker, dude. Negative social signal.

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#152

Marissa Meyer seems like a really bad CEO.

She's basically in the spot Fiorina was in - the ship is slowly taking on water for Schumpeterian life cycle reasons.

I don't really understand the reference, but despite the spot she was in when she started she obviously have done some bad shit right from the get go. Like banning remote work and now this.

Then there is no seeming investment in the stuff Yahoo! is good at which is simply weird.

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#153
post #150
post #29

Wow, so many different news about the same tech company within a month and now this one too. They could not have pulled a better stunt to compete with what Apple and Google is doing in their keynote. http://gizmodo.com/7-of-yahoos-biggest-fuck-ups-1745729341 http://gizmodo.com/how-yahoo-totally-blew-it-on-security-178... http://gizmodo.com/heres-what-happened-to-all-of-marissa-may... http://gizmodo.com/yahoo-secretly…

You have to wonder if there is some sort of campaign to smear yahoo? The timing does seem strange, but perhaps it's simply because they are under so much scrutiny because of the eventual sale?

Yahoo and Twitter have been getting torn apart the past few weeks, coincidentally when they are selling. Probably a little bit of column A and column B.

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#154
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't deny that the situation must be analyzed carefully but going from "less than 20 percent female" to "more than 80 percent female" in less than 2 years leaves little room for doubt. Also this adds up to the undisclosed security breach and the fact that Yahoo secretly scanned emails for US Intel.. Not a very defensible behavior.

Going from less than 20 percent female to more than 80 percent female is being exactly as discriminatory , though. You should have been offended all along, right?

No you don't get it. When men get their jobs its because of their hard work and abilities. When women get jobs its because of mass discrimination against males!

/s

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#155
post #20

“..less than 20 percent female. Within a year and a half those top managers were more than 80 percent female,” Even if they were not deliberate about it, they must have talked about how this might be perceived by employees. As bad as this issue is, I think hiring friend/referral/former colleague, especially en mass is much bigger issue that's rarely talked about because it's not necessarily illegal. However, I cannot…

How would we distinguish this from true performance-based reviews? The question has to be asked, because when its the other way around, we defend it as normal. But this way it has to be rigged? Isn't it perfectly possible that a true objective management review would find many women to be competent? More competent than most men? Why not? Just because 'men usually win' in this context? Because its ok when men are in charge and promote mostly men? That's just 'business as usual'.

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#156

Just reading this brought back memories of working at LinkedIn, and why I'll never again work for a company who has institutional performance review processes. That pretty much excludes all big tech companies and I'm perfectly fine with that. The cookie-cutter performance review process is impersonal and has absolutely nothing to do with helping people do their best work. In my case, I had a manager who simply didn't…

I had one large company where performance was really one bit - ranking was on a scale of 1 to 5 and, as I was told, "nobody is a 5 and if you were a 1 or 2 you'd already have been sacked". So everyone was either a 3 (meeting expectations) or 4 (exceeding expectations in some areas). I did manage to persuade my line manager (the CIO) to give me a 5 on something but he then felt the need to mark me down somewhere else…

Sounds like high school teachers who refuse to give a perfect 100 because "nobody is perfect".

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#157
post #20

“..less than 20 percent female. Within a year and a half those top managers were more than 80 percent female,” Even if they were not deliberate about it, they must have talked about how this might be perceived by employees. As bad as this issue is, I think hiring friend/referral/former colleague, especially en mass is much bigger issue that's rarely talked about because it's not necessarily illegal. However, I cannot…

> Even if they were not deliberate about it Which is statistically close to impossible.

...but when men are in the 80%, that's a statistic you can believe?

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#158

I'm deeply offended by this and personally I will cease to use Yahoo Mail. I urge any self-respecting males to stop using any of Yahoo services as a form of protest for this despicable act of discrimination. And I'm serious; too much is too much.

Of course someone who uses the term 'self-respecting males' is still using Yahoo mail.

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#159

I'm deeply offended by this and personally I will cease to use Yahoo Mail. I urge any self-respecting males to stop using any of Yahoo services as a form of protest for this despicable act of discrimination. And I'm serious; too much is too much.

But it was ok when 80% men were in charge. No laptop rage then. No calls of boycott for discrimination. No sir; men are naturally in charge and anything else is a subversion of the natural order.

This whole thread is disturbing at a very basic level.

Re: Lawsuit: Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male workers

#160
post #93

There’s a reason why people make tons of money playing the stock market against companies that artificially force gender, or racial equality. Practices like these are going to ruin your business the same way being sexist, or racist will. Either you hire the best person for the job, or you’ll be beaten by companies that do.

> There’s a reason why people make tons of money playing the stock market against companies that artificially force gender, or racial equality.

Do you have any examples of this? Many, if not most, large firms actively seek diversity.

Post reply on HN