Earlier quoted context omitted.
Individual states already issue identification cards, and people use that all the time for this purpose. In a system like the US, I think it's better for the states to handle identification cards, not the federal government. There's a lot of details that go into identifying someone, and your local state is best equipped to handle that. To give a few examples: What's the procedure for changing your name? A lot of peop…
> If the federal government runs it, now they have to own or rent a bunch of land in every major city in every state so they can service id card requests. Don't we already have that with the post offices and the passport system? Couldn't they expand passports into a Federal ID system?
I'm not qualified to comment on constitutional issues so I won't.
I will say that, even if it's mostly an emotional issue (people already need at least some sort of state government-issued ID to do lots of things), there's a huge resistance in the US to anything that smells like "papers, please" or universal ID that people are required to carry and present upon request.
Which is how a lot of people view the idea of a Federal ID system. That may seem silly to a lot of people outside the US but it's how things are.