Live data from Hacker News

A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

ifixit.org

111–120 of 209 posts

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#111
post #53
post #44

Note that in Europe, whatever Apple says, you have a 2 years warranty for this kind of problem. Also, do the chip really need a replacement, or a simple reflow would work?

I'm not even sure how they would try to argue against it. "Yes, the phone developed a fault under typical use within the warranty period and yes, a lot of other customers are having the same problem, but" ...? Apple devices are luxury goods sold at a high premium. You expect that stuff to withstand at least the same everyday handling as their competitors' products in the same market segment.

Just because something is obvious doesn't mean they won't try to argue against it. Look at the "holding the phone wrong" debacle

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#112
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i had this happen to my 6+ a year while under warranty. The Apple Genius Bar I took it to had seen this problem before and knew to twist it to get it working. He made sure it was backed up to iCloud and then gave me a replacement. This new phone also got the gray bar of death after 3 weeks. I speculate that I was bending the phone in my pocket. I had gained 20 pounds in six months due to job stress and suddenly my pa…

"Apple advises customers to lose at least 20 pounds before reporting any issues."

They have been pushing fitness really hard lately.

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#113
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I Wouldn't be surprised if the DOD was the biggest customer for both.. "subsidy" doesn't mean they were owned or directly financed.

Owned? No, it doesn't mean that. Directly financed? I wouldn't call it a subsidy otherwise: https://www.google.com/search?q=subsidy&oq=subsidy

A subsidy can exist in effect when the terms are overly favorable and not at market rate.

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#114
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I Wouldn't be surprised if the DOD was the biggest customer for both.. "subsidy" doesn't mean they were owned or directly financed.

Owned? No, it doesn't mean that. Directly financed? I wouldn't call it a subsidy otherwise: https://www.google.com/search?q=subsidy&oq=subsidy

[deleted]

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For comparison: it's $949 + sales tax in the US, and 1075€ ($1200) in Germany, including 19% VAT. So the German price without VAT is the same as the Norwegian without VAT. Mandatory warranty in Germany is 2 years, where in the first six months the manufacturer has to prove that it wasn't defective when they sold it to you if they want to dispute your claim. After six months, there's a reversal in the burden of proof,…

> Mandatory warranty > the manufacturer has to prove Just nitpicking: the mandatory warranty ("Gewährleistung") is supplied by the seller , not the manufacturer . As a consumer you don't need to deal with the latter no matter what the former is trying to tell you. In the same line, the burden of proof after six month is on the seller not the manufacturer. A manufacturer often has an additional voluntary warranty ("Ga…

It is the same here, you never deal with the company, just send it to the store and they handle it from there.

The five or two year warranty is called "Reklamasjonsrett" in Norwegian which covers design and manufacturing flaws. It also states that the seller can try to fix it three times, after that it needs to give you something equivalent (i.e. a new phone of at least the price of the old) and that they can't charge the customer for any ting relating to the repair.

But we also have the "Garanti" from the manufacturer like you do.

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#116
post #99

Have there been any iPhone without "design defect"? Does any one think "design defect" is not made by accident since Apple fights everyone who tried to fix their iPhone on their own?

The 4 had the "you're holding it wrong" antenna. The 6+ is too bendy. What else has there been?

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#117
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And then people in your country probably get all upset when things cost way more. See "ripoff Britain" or all of the controversy in Australia. Your politicians won't break you the hard truth, but the reason why you pay more is that it's more expensive to sell to you.

Are you really claiming that expectation for a piece of hardware to work more than 2 years is something that hugely increases costs? We're not talking 15 years here. 2 years.

Apple charges $99 for the two year warranty in the states. You get that "free" in Europe. Add in all of the other regulatory burdens, labor laws, and such, and it's very easy to see why things cost more in the rest of the Western world.

As a perfect example, they're likely on the hook for many millions of dollars of repairs with this issue in the article in the EU. In the US, only the people that had the problem early on or bought the extended warranty are covered. There ain't no free lunch.

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#118
It seems one of the solutions to this problem is not sticking your iphone into a back pocket of your skinny jeans.

I constantly see girls sticking an iphone into the back pocket of their pants that are so tight you wonder how they even got it in there. Then they sit down with the damn phone still in there. I am surprised it doesn't snap in half.

I typically carry my phone or keep it in my front pocket removing it before I sit down in fear of bending it.

It's not a wallet, it's a delicate piece of electronics that requires care in handling.

Re: A Design Defect Is Breaking iPhone 6 Pluses

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are they? My 20 month old (i.e. out of warranty and with no Applecare policy) iphone 6+ started showing the symptoms a week and a half ago. The "Genius" at the Apple Store immediately recognised the symptoms and processed a free replacement (refurbished) phone without any prompting or negotiation on my part. So while it's true that they are staying very quiet about it in public, it does seem that knowledge of the pro…

Note: if you are in the EU, settle for nothing less than a new phone (rather than refurbished). There was recently a lawsuit in the Netherlands where someone sued Apple after receiving a refurbished phone after replacement under warranty [1]. She won the case: https://www.iphoned.nl/nieuws/rechtszaak-apple-garantie/ The judge based his verdict on a verdict of the European Court of Justice [2], so it's likely that the…

I'm content with refurbs, under warranty. I consider it an extended burn-in period. (Maybe I'm wrong?)
Post reply on HN