Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That's great for transparency, researchers and journalists and makes corruption much harder to get away with. So, I think in this case, "transparency", "researchers" and "journalists" are all highly irrelevant. 1. Journalists shouldn't write articles about how person X makes €Xm a year. The friend of my cousins husband was abducted when he was a kid, because the press kept writing articles about how wealthy his fam…
> 1. Journalists shouldn't write articles about how person X makes €Xm a year. I disagree. If some CEO says that workers salaries are too high and he himself increased his salary by 50% the last year, that is important for journalists to write about. > 2. Researchers: the data could easily be anonymized. Researches are interested in seeing how different variables correlate with salary. Like gender, age, education lev…
Like what? A house? You can't really catch cash transactions.
I would assume that in developed economies the "easiest" and least transparent way of corruption happening is friends doing each other favours. I.e. person A can influence the granting of permits through his friend, person B. In return for helping person C get a permit, he gets a board seat in the company of person D, via person C.