WikiLeaks offers $20,000 for information on former DNC staffer's murder

Post by ceejayoz » Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 2:23 PM UTC

tanderson92 wrote: post #113

ceejayoz wrote: post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The DNC also has in its charter that they must work to get Democratic candidates elected and work towards getting the ideals of the Democratic Party implemented. Sanders didn't lose because the DNC said mean things in their internal email system. He likely lost because he never made much of a dent in the heavily black Democratic voting population in the South.

Did I say anything about why he lost? In fact most of these e-mails released so far occurred after he had little chance of winning. Nope, pure distraction in an attempt to deflect from my points. Also see: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056 I'm sure you'll be back to "correct the record"!

Post by neals » Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 2:26 PM UTC

dr_ wrote: post #130

chatmasta wrote: post #109

Of course you'll be called a "conspiracy theorist" for speculating about this case in any way deviating from the official narrative. But the circumstances are extremely suspicious. The DNC voter expansion data director was found shot dead, assassination style, two bullets in the back, in one of the safest neighborhoods of DC. Nothing was taken off his person. No forensic evidence was left behind. Yet the police deeme…

It occurred around 4 in the morning, in an area with several recent robberies. He was also pretty banged up apparently, implying a struggle. If you were intending to assassinate someone, you probably wouldn't fight with them first.

Post by tanderson92 » Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 2:27 PM UTC

sanderjd wrote: post #117

tanderson92 wrote: post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is false, and your "correcting the record" is only spreading mistruths. This e-mail in particular is clear discussion of acting on promoting a narrative (i.e. shopping it to news organizations) to discredit Bernie's campaign: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056 I'm sure you'll find a way to explain that away though.

I feel like I'm just a curious bystander here - I haven't read much about the emails, nor looked at any of them individually until clicking on your link, so I really haven't formed an opinion on how noxious they are - but I don't see the smoking gun you seem to see in that email... Could you provide some more perspective on the issue, for those of us who are new to this debate?

Post by tanderson92 » Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 2:29 PM UTC

sitic wrote: post #115

tanderson92 wrote: post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is false, and your "correcting the record" is only spreading mistruths. This e-mail in particular is clear discussion of acting on promoting a narrative (i.e. shopping it to news organizations) to discredit Bernie's campaign: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056 I'm sure you'll find a way to explain that away though.

This email is dated May 21, just 2 weeks before AP called the primary for Clinton. It was pretty clear by that point to everyone that Clinton would win the primary. I'm not surprised to see DNC discussing narratives for the point when the primary is over. This is no evidence that the primary was rigged.

Post by Eldwick » Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 2:30 PM UTC

chatmasta wrote: post #109

Of course you'll be called a "conspiracy theorist" for speculating about this case in any way deviating from the official narrative. But the circumstances are extremely suspicious. The DNC voter expansion data director was found shot dead, assassination style, two bullets in the back, in one of the safest neighborhoods of DC. Nothing was taken off his person. No forensic evidence was left behind. Yet the police deeme…