Live data from Hacker News

The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

web.archive.org

1–10 of 42 posts

Re: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

#3
In section 17, Stress-Influence Tendency (p21-22), he mentions some final work by Pavlov, but doesn't provide a citation. I spent some time trying to find it when I first read this years ago, but was unable to. I'm wondering whether it's even reliable: I'd think that work by Pavlov could be found with him as an author, rather than in a "popular paperback" written by an un-named psychiatrist. If anyone knows what book he must have been talking about, or can point to the particular papers by Pavlov, I'd like to know.

Re: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

#4
I realize this is going to make me sound rather dull-minded, but despite the pdf sounding very interesting, I don't have much inclination to read 27 pages of it without knowing more. Can someone summarize the author's main thesis, and whether he's able to robustly justify that thesis with supporting evidence?

Re: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

#5
post #4

I realize this is going to make me sound rather dull-minded, but despite the pdf sounding very interesting, I don't have much inclination to read 27 pages of it without knowing more. Can someone summarize the author's main thesis, and whether he's able to robustly justify that thesis with supporting evidence?

Sure, they totally did!

(And because you didn't read it, you'll never know if I'm bullshitting you or not. Don't outsource your thinking.)

Re: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

#6

In section 17, Stress-Influence Tendency (p21-22), he mentions some final work by Pavlov, but doesn't provide a citation. I spent some time trying to find it when I first read this years ago, but was unable to. I'm wondering whether it's even reliable: I'd think that work by Pavlov could be found with him as an author, rather than in a "popular paperback" written by an un-named psychiatrist. If anyone knows what book…

Not sure if it is the case here at all. But sometimes those old Soviet-bloc "original research" documents can be hard to find. An example of this elsewhere is the Levenshtein distance -- everybody knows what this is, but the actual original document was a Soviet-era journal: Влади́мир И. Левенштейн (1965). Двоичные коды с исправлением выпадений, вставок и замещений символов [Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals]. Доклады Академий Наук СCCP (in Russian) 163 (4): 845–8. Appeared in English as: Levenshtein, Vladimir I. (February 1966). "Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals". Soviet Physics Doklady 10 (8): 707–710.

Re: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

#7
post #4

I realize this is going to make me sound rather dull-minded, but despite the pdf sounding very interesting, I don't have much inclination to read 27 pages of it without knowing more. Can someone summarize the author's main thesis, and whether he's able to robustly justify that thesis with supporting evidence?

Sure, they totally did! (And because you didn't read it, you'll never know if I'm bullshitting you or not. Don't outsource your thinking.)

That's like not reading reviews before going to a restaurant.

Re: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

#9
This is by Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's less-public partner.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Munger

There are two great books collecting his thoughts:

https://sivers.org/book/SeekingWisdom

https://www.poorcharliesalmanack.com/pca.php

His main quip is, "All I want to know is where I'm going to die, so I'll never go there."

It's meant metaphorically, in that his approach to success is mainly to just avoid mistakes.

(He's my hero.)

Re: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment (2005) [pdf]

#10
post #4

I realize this is going to make me sound rather dull-minded, but despite the pdf sounding very interesting, I don't have much inclination to read 27 pages of it without knowing more. Can someone summarize the author's main thesis, and whether he's able to robustly justify that thesis with supporting evidence?

Sure, they totally did! (And because you didn't read it, you'll never know if I'm bullshitting you or not. Don't outsource your thinking.)

> Don't outsource your thinking

Should he believe you or not? I'm baffled.

Post reply on HN