Added in edit: Assuming it's not possible to change advisor ... You have to make a decision: Quit, or take control of your own education and finish. You will need your supervisor to deal with the administrative aspects of your degree, so you can't avoid him entirely. However, you can limit your contact with him to that role alone. However, you will need someone to supervise your academic requirements. So you need to…
> But it can be done, and if you succeed it becomes a major, major accomplishment on your CV. I agree with your advice except for this line. To be clear, a Ph.D does count as a "major, major accomplishment on your CV" (at least to the right audience). But you won't get any extra credit for putting up with a bad adviser. I am tempted to simply advise quitting, but switching to another adviser (or even sticking it out)…
> I agree with your advice except for this
> line ... you won't get any extra credit
> for putting up with a bad adviser.
The value doesn't lie in putting up with a bad advisor, it lies in taking control and organising things. It lies in being in a bad situation and devising a plan to deal with it. It lies in solving a problem, accomplishing a goal, despite starting from a poor situation.The value is in having proof that you can manage your resources and create a positive outcome.
Since several people are saying the same thing I'll add my response here:
Yes, absolutely, probably not actually the thing to put on your CV. Bu anyone who values a PhD in a candidate will appreciate the comment "As it happens I didn't get along with my supervisor, just personal chemistry as it happens, but I overcame that by taking control." I believe that for most people who knows about PhDs that is actually worth something.
To the original poster - people disagree with me, and that's worth considering. I could be wrong.