Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not quite the same thing though. These systems are active. They have sound being produces most likely at a very specific frequency and then listened for so that depth information can be gathered. This instead images the sound that's already out there in the light. It's the difference between lidar and a camera
Sounds to me more like the difference between using the flash or not.
The Daredevil Camera
81–90 of 158 posts
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#82This is the definition of what a 'hacker' is, great read.
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder how many other cool-ass projects like this are going on that we have no idea about.
Or the pages that give tantalising hints about a project, but there doesn't seem to be a write-up anywhere. https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotoopa_hs/sets/72157611107153... https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotoopa_hs/4082464167/in/album...
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you inch closer towards a reality where there are alternatives to the boring normal day job
Sadly, such things don't pay the bills. (Unless i missed some sort of karma/like/wow monetization :) )
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#85I have an idea for you. You mention that you want to use a webcam so that you can "overlay" this information on top of an image.
What if you could send it directly to your brain?
There is a technology called Brainport[0], which is effectively a 16x16 grid of electrodes small enough to place on your tongue. By feeding electrical impulses through these electrodes, you stimulate the nerves on your tongue. After two minutes of a "champagn bubbling" sensation, your brain rewires the senses from your tongue to your visual cortex and you can "sense" any input.
This technology has been used to give sight to the blind, balance to those with inner ear problems, and sonar to NAVY seals.
It would be amazing if you were the first person in the world to truly "see" sound.
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#86And it's about time someone did it! Yours is the first hobbyist project I've encountered since my own extremely crude ten-dollar version in 1981. No square array or processing, mine was a mechanical scanner-disk: eight LEDs glued in a spiral to an old vinyl record album, each with an electret microphone and and op amp. Spin the disk with a motor at about 6Hz. Wind noise, so add foam to the mics. It worked. A mechanical acoustic-phosphor raster sensor and display screen, where sound patterns caused light patterns. The best part was to hold some headphones near it while playing 10KHz sine wave. This produced interference stripes on the scanning disk! I hoped to build a huge version someday, but somebody beat me to it: Tom Zimmerman, an MIT student who patented the dataglove, then used the money to work at Exploratorium Museum for a year (as Artist in Residence), building a scanning-microphone LED disk about 6ft wide.
Since then we have companies selling DIDSON full-blown video for underwater (with sonic illumination,) also a euro company with a 3D phase-array microphone imager positioned on a ring or a wire sphere. See:
http://www.soundmetrics.com/Image-Gallery/Fisheries/Habitat-...
Heh, the divers appear to be skeletons wearing scuba tanks.
http://www.acoustic-camera.com/en/products/microphone-arrays...
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#87Yay, a sound-field camera! I've been wondering if such things are made. Should I take the existence of this project as an indication that they aren't? The use case I imagine is finding what part of a machine is emitting a noise, much like how you would use a thermal camera for finding what part of it is running hot.
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#88This is the definition of what a 'hacker' is, great read.
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well as it happens there are special sonar cameras out there capable of providing real-time video images[0][1]. The use case here is being able for a diver or ROV to see in murky water [0] http://www.soundmetrics.com/image-gallery [1] http://www.apl.washington.edu/programs/z_DIDSON/Pages/LIMIS....
Not quite the same thing though. These systems are active. They have sound being produces most likely at a very specific frequency and then listened for so that depth information can be gathered. This instead images the sound that's already out there in the light. It's the difference between lidar and a camera
Re: The Daredevil Camera
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you inch closer towards a reality where there are alternatives to the boring normal day job
Sadly, such things don't pay the bills. (Unless i missed some sort of karma/like/wow monetization :) )