Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is a horribly complicated way to do 17 + 35. The sane way is to try matching against a pattern, then if that fails you fall back to the traditional algorithm with the numbers lined up one over the other and doing the carries. Yes, you can run the traditional algorithm in your head, for this and for much larger things. Fully in memory, 4-digit plus 4-digit is quite doable. (can your method handle that?) While sta…
>(can your method handle that?) It's not "my" method. I'm not quite sure what I did to merit attitude and hostility, but to answer your question: Yes. Third-graders are expected to do it with 3-digit numbers. You'll have to take my word for it that I'm capable of adding 4-digit numbers. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/3/NBT/#CCSS.Math.C...
BTW, my shortcut got mangled by Hacker News. Multiplication turned into italics. I did 17 times 3, which is great, but I don't think that anybody should be expected to see that path to a solution.