Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
1–10 of 157 posts
Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#2Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#3Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#4If Agile is dead, why is there a new article about Agile on HN everyday. I think Agile is dying, not dead.
Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#5If Agile is dead, why is there a new article about Agile on HN everyday. I think Agile is dying, not dead.
Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#6just use your brain. agile is only a problem when people follow it religiously instead of intelligently imo.
its just one tool in the box, not the ultimate methodology.
Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#7Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#8If Agile is dead, why is there a new article about Agile on HN everyday. I think Agile is dying, not dead.
Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#9Re: Agile Is Dead, Long Live Continuous Delivery
#10If Agile is dead, why is there a new article about Agile on HN everyday. I think Agile is dying, not dead.
I was just having this thought last night. "eXtreme Programming" and Scrum seem to either exist in a clunky bureaucratic mutant form or have evolved into companies that use CI and prioritize really good communication. (Yes, people in the late 90's and early 00's did sometimes write it like that.)