Earlier quoted context omitted.
LMAO....you literally just said prior to this comment: "We are not trying to ensure there is an "arbitrary number" of certain types of people working in our field." You are a walking Poster Child for hypocrisy.
How does sharing such stats imply achieving "arbitrary numbers" in any sense? I am pointing at data showing a large disparity in tech employment relative to the population. Women are equally as capable as men when it comes to tech, so we should expect equal representation. We don't get equal representation because of existing cultural biases against women in this field. It's the same reason we don't get equal represe…
This is conjecture.
> We don't get equal representation because of existing cultural biases against women in this field.
As is this.
You are pointing to data and making your own conclusions that the data simply isn't complete enough to show.