Earlier quoted context omitted.
The ability to describe anything says nothing about the clarity of the description
While playing the devil's advocate, I could argue that the description using only 0 and 1 is more precise than the phrase "It's a picture of a white cliff on the shore of the sea, possibly in the south of England, in the foreground there's the silhouette of a man or woman to small to distinguish clearly at the bottom of the cliff, the sky above the cliff is bright blue with a few trailing clouds etc etc etc etc etc".…
Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
91–100 of 230 posts
Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just a small nit: The words sound alike but they mean different things. You should have read everything, then you would have seen the reference. Source: grammer.
This is just a phonetic misspelling of the contraction "should've" which really is pronounced "should of"
Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#93Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#94Am I the only one to find that using only the 1,000 most common words actually makes thing harder to understand? The writer ends up having to use convoluted paraphrases to refer to things where a precise, well defined and well understood word exists but it's not part of the top 1,000.
Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#95Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#96What was interesting to me was that I could learn a foreign language by only learning 2,000 words!
Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#97A better application would be to underline words not included in the whitelist and to provide a synonym included in the whitelist upon right clicking.
But as I learned in school: a language's diversity is beautiful, why restrain ourselves in the vocabulary we use?
In particular, a boring text with many repetition is just hard to read, see the discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11131391
Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
The ability to describe anything says nothing about the clarity of the description
While playing the devil's advocate, I could argue that the description using only 0 and 1 is more precise than the phrase "It's a picture of a white cliff on the shore of the sea, possibly in the south of England, in the foreground there's the silhouette of a man or woman to small to distinguish clearly at the bottom of the cliff, the sky above the cliff is bright blue with a few trailing clouds etc etc etc etc etc".…
Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#99It's neat but not very useful. I'd actually be interested in an editor that enforces E-Prime[1] to see if it made writing more clear. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Prime
Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English
#100Would love a slider that would allow you to adjust the words allowed from 500 most common words in English to 10k most common words. Also, it would be great if you could compile a windows version.