Live data from Hacker News

Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

github.com

91–100 of 230 posts

Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

#91
post #88
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The ability to describe anything says nothing about the clarity of the description

While playing the devil's advocate, I could argue that the description using only 0 and 1 is more precise than the phrase "It's a picture of a white cliff on the shore of the sea, possibly in the south of England, in the foreground there's the silhouette of a man or woman to small to distinguish clearly at the bottom of the cliff, the sky above the cliff is bright blue with a few trailing clouds etc etc etc etc etc".…

I agree with you, but clarity is not the same thing as precision.

Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just a small nit: The words sound alike but they mean different things. You should have read everything, then you would have seen the reference. Source: grammer.

This is just a phonetic misspelling of the contraction "should've" which really is pronounced "should of"

However, should've is a shortened version of should have so I think the point still stands.

Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

#94

Am I the only one to find that using only the 1,000 most common words actually makes thing harder to understand? The writer ends up having to use convoluted paraphrases to refer to things where a precise, well defined and well understood word exists but it's not part of the top 1,000.

You are correct. Lectern v. podium. When we have specific words for things, we should use them. Moving down a step in specificity is not conducive to clarity.

Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

#96
I read years ago that the vocabulary used on TV was about 2,000 words. A high school graduate has a vocabulary of 10,000 words, a college graduate 30,000, and there are a million words in the English language.

What was interesting to me was that I could learn a foreign language by only learning 2,000 words!

Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

#97
The most annoying application on earth :)

A better application would be to underline words not included in the whitelist and to provide a synonym included in the whitelist upon right clicking.

But as I learned in school: a language's diversity is beautiful, why restrain ourselves in the vocabulary we use?

In particular, a boring text with many repetition is just hard to read, see the discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11131391

Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

#98
post #88
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The ability to describe anything says nothing about the clarity of the description

While playing the devil's advocate, I could argue that the description using only 0 and 1 is more precise than the phrase "It's a picture of a white cliff on the shore of the sea, possibly in the south of England, in the foreground there's the silhouette of a man or woman to small to distinguish clearly at the bottom of the cliff, the sky above the cliff is bright blue with a few trailing clouds etc etc etc etc etc".…

[deleted]

Re: Cleartext: A text editor that only allows the 1,000 most common words in English

#100

Would love a slider that would allow you to adjust the words allowed from 500 most common words in English to 10k most common words. Also, it would be great if you could compile a windows version.

Or how about the more uncommon the word the more like the background tone it is so that you get instant visual feedback?
Post reply on HN