Earlier quoted context omitted.
Today, the ditch digging s done with small excavators, not with hordes of guys with shovels...
Today's ditch digging is done with emacs and vim, building useless CRUD apps
Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
121–130 of 266 posts
Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
> We have created a gargantuan advertising industry that has zero net material gain for society Why do people say this, when they know full well that advertising drives people to buy things, and therefore, drive the economy?
Because it doesn't. These people wouldn't just hoard their money because there is no ad telling them what to buy... They'd just be exercising their own agency, rather then cokes, or nikes.
If there were no advertising, not many people would know about—let alone buy—video games. But dollar for dollar video games are much better for them than alternatives like drugs.
Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#123Manufacturing isn't coming back. Do you think your average American would put up with the conditions in a Chinese iPhone factory?
Sweatshops exist in China, but the top electronics manufacturers (mostly Taiwan-owned) have relatively good conditions.
Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#124Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#125> "There was room for improvement, he argued, for what he called “job-centric” economics and politics. In a job-centric system, job creation would be the nation’s No. 1 objective, with the government setting priorities and arraying the forces necessary to achieve the goal, and with businesses operating not only in their immediate profit interest but also in the interests of “employees, and employees yet to be hired.”…
Hong Kong is a prime example of the government improving quality of life by staying out of the way of business. http://triblive.com/mobile/6727056-96/hong-kong-free
Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't it already happening. If you put a population of flies in a closed container, even with an unlimited food supply, their population will grow and grow until it hits a peak and collapases. We are smarter than flies but to think we are not also constrained by nature is folly?
The only reason the fly colony would collapse is if it ran out of a resource. No point in giving them an unlimited food supply because it's a resource like any other.
Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#127The problem with running everything with simple money is that it is like running a body on doped water alone. I can't even say blood because money is one dimensional and blood has many useful components.
I think something like Ethereum is going in the right decentralized and high-tech direction. If we can have a common information platform then we can wire up our systems to be more decentralized and also have the capability to do holistic calculation and goals as well as evolve the system.
So I think having society integrate common information platform is key to turning this from a bunch of monopoly games into more like a wired game of Eve Online, or at least something where we can keep track of more than one stat ($) per entity.
Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't it already happening. If you put a population of flies in a closed container, even with an unlimited food supply, their population will grow and grow until it hits a peak and collapases. We are smarter than flies but to think we are not also constrained by nature is folly?
No one denies that we are constrained by nature and limited resources. There are two things that preclude your hypothetical "collapse" event from happening. 1. Scientific discovery and innovation. People were all in huge panic in the 17/18/19th century about the ability of our limited amount of land to feed the (exponentially-growing) populace, yet discovery of new methods/technologies increased the hypothetical yiel…
Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#129Re: Andy Grove’s Warning to Silicon Valley
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it doesn't. These people wouldn't just hoard their money because there is no ad telling them what to buy... They'd just be exercising their own agency, rather then cokes, or nikes.
> These people wouldn't just hoard their money because there is no ad telling them what to buy... wut? People see an ad, they're more likely buy that thing. If they don't see an ad, they don't buy that thing. You think people are still going to be spending their money if they aren't talked into buying things? lol. The economy grows when people spend money. Disincentivizing people from spending money is a good way to…
Just a tought I have sometimes. Sometime in the future we will need to think another way to measure economic improvement.