Live data from Hacker News

Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

syonyk.blogspot.com

201–210 of 367 posts

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#201
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

10k gallons costs you $18,000 or less right now "while gas is cheap" - for a TCO of $20,000 in 20 years (plus cheap-ish repairs) - and you are driving a Merc. The model 3 (once you can actually get hold of it) will cost you $35,000 up front, plus about $7,000 in electricity for 200k miles at prices of 13-15c/kWh, plus about two battery replacements - battery lifetime is 8 years or 125k miles - at $10,000ish a pop - f…

I just filled up yesterday and gas was 2.89$ a gallon. Where exactly is it 1.80?

$2.89 seems particularly high. Would it be right to guess that you are a non-price conscious buyer in California? Here's a map for the US: http://www.gasbuddy.com/GasPriceMap?z=4

Here's a map comparing average San Francisco, California gasoline prices (one of the highest in the US) to Tucson, AZ (one of the lowest): http://charts.gasbuddy.com/ch.gaschart?Country=USA&Crude=t&P...

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's the other way around: by restricting who can service the car, they are artificially keeping the resale value up, which works out to cheaper financing (after all, you finance the difference between purchase price and resale price).

How is restricting who can service the car supposed to keep the resale value up? It means the prospective buyer will have to pay more for repairs when they're necessary, the cost of which comes out of what they'll be willing to pay for the car.

It ensures that servicing is performed by qualified personnel, thereby mitigating the market for lemons.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#203
post #191

One of the things that makes a car valuable is having a healthy aftermarket. It looks like, from this article anyway, Tesla is doing anything they can to make sure there is no aftermarket for their vehicles. To me, a car that you can't service yourself is worthless. A car that needs the manufacturer's permission to activate is not your car--it's owned by the manufacturer. And, when the manufacturer places a threateni…

But think about it from another perspective: someone purchases Tesla car, decided to service it himself without sufficient knowledge, then later he resells his car to another individual, the person who buys his car enables the autopilot mode on a car and because of the poor service quality/mistake the original owner did to a car the autopilot goes crazy and steers your car into a brick wall, everyone will blame Tesla…

You simply can't enable Autopilot if the car is produced before May 2015, because it is missing the required hardware.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#204
post #144
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would wager that 80% of cars that are crushed (which weren't in an accident) could be repaired (if broken) or 'fixed up' to operate better than the last owner thought possible for less than a days work and perhaps a few hundred dollars. I do appreciate your point, but I think people are far too afraid of older cars and they are scrapped too soon. I was hoping to convince some folk in this tech community that old ca…

My '04 vibe needs new catalytic converters, exhaust, and tires, which are altogether right about the book value of the car. So I'm going to disagree on "few hundred dollars", at least here in Canada where the road salt eats cars.

I live in Mexico, and a few hundred dollars will get you a complete new exhaust system for both your car and your partners car. It won't be OEM, but it will work.

And tires, I see that as a consumable like gasoline, so wouldn't include that in the few hundred dollars.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#205
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never bought a 2016 model car (maybe something changed this year?) so I have never heard about the concept of having to ask a manufacturer to "activate" your car before reading this article. I buy used cars and repair them myself. I wonder if this disqualifies me from ever owning an electric car? While more recent cars have begun down the troubling path of making less and less user-serviceable, most cars still h…

If you a replacing an ECU on a car with a new one, you have to flash it with the right firmware for the vin number of the car. At least that's the case with Chrysler. My friend works at a Chrysler dealership as a tech, and he says that basically anything you now put in on the car, be it something complex, like the ECU, or something simple, like the windshield washer control module, it has to be programmed. If you don…

> On BMW M3 you even need a computer to "program" a new battery.

You're "calibrating" the battery. This has been around on BMWs for a long time (my 2008 535xi had this). If you replace the battery yourself and obviously can't program it in, the car will bitch endlessly, but it'll still work.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#206
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which model exactly? How is it more environmentally friendly than a Tesla? Surely the mileage is very poor...? (I'm in the market for a cheap car and am genuinely interested in your answers ;-)

It's more environmentally friendly because it's already built.

The gasoline dwarfs the initial car manufacturer, as far as environmentalism goes.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're going to go down that route (no pun intended), why not eventually ban everything but officially certified driverless cars from public roads? I suppose it gets into a bit of a philosophical question at some point --- some people just want to get from A to B as quickly as possible (with whatever currently technology allows), while others actually enjoy the driving experience and having control over their vehi…

> If you're going to go down that route (no pun intended), why not eventually ban everything but officially certified driverless cars from public roads? I agree. That's the way its going to go. People kill 40K/people a year in the US simply driving, and injure/maim hundreds of thousands. There's no way self-driving cars aren't better than that. Want to build your vroom vroom car? Own the entire stack down to the atom…

There likely exists a larger stockpile of fairly well-engineered manually driven cars than there were buggies during the advent of the automobile. This existing stock will likely buffer the robotic revolution of our roads somewhat. Also, I think the convenience delta from self-driven car to "driverless" car is smaller than that from keeping living horses to regular maintenance of an automobile.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#208

This article is spot on, but the author fails to account for the fact that on _most_ new cars, your in the same boat. Unless its a maintenance item, your not going to be able to replace it with anything but the manufacture's blessing. The biggest difference is there are a lot more maintenance parts on a conventional car, so you have more of an opportunity to replace things. It was my understanding that the only true…

> It was my understanding that the only true maintenance part on the Tesla was the wiper blades.

And the brakes / tires.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#209
post #131
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would wager that 80% of cars that are crushed (which weren't in an accident) could be repaired (if broken) or 'fixed up' to operate better than the last owner thought possible for less than a days work and perhaps a few hundred dollars. I do appreciate your point, but I think people are far too afraid of older cars and they are scrapped too soon. I was hoping to convince some folk in this tech community that old ca…

I totally buy the environmental impact argument on keeping that Mercedes vs buying the Tesla. That isn't the only concern though. In a high speed collision against a modern 5-Star vehicle the people in the Mercedes are pretty much toast. I think it's possible you could upgrade the safety of an older vehicle in many ways, but realistically most owners never would beyond tires and modest braking improvements. And you'l…

If I could install aftermarket side airbags I would. It's the main advance missing from the older cars.

I don't agree with your statement about the high speed collision though. If it's front on, the strength of the passenger compartment and the weight of your vehicle vs the other car are the most important thing, in which case the Mercedes is likely to come out even or better.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#210
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Accidentally melting your power electronics doesn't activate your smelly, smoky, aggressive, obnoxious monster senses?

nah but tuning carbs makes me all bothered. like debugging bothered.

Sweating and profanity, too?
Post reply on HN