Reminds me of the quote from Rumsfeld. Reformatted by http://www.slate.com/id/2081042/ The Unknown As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know We don't know.
It always bugged me how Rumsfeld was slagged for that statement. I found it a very clear explanation of the difficulty in assessing a chaotic environment.
No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
41–50 of 84 posts
Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#42Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#43Talking about shit don't know you don't know without referencing Rumsfeld's "The Unknown" almost feels like plagiarism.
Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#44 You think I'm an ignorant savage
And you've been so many places
I guess it must be so
But still I cannot see
If the savage one is me
How can there be so much that you don't know
You don't know
...
But if you walk the footsteps of a stranger
You'll learn things you never knew you never knew
That seems to pretty precisely describe the two groups: Pocahontas being in the nurse's position, unsure of her own stance, while the English men squarely fit into the egotistical group.Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#45http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Classical-Definition-of-Kn...
Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#46Sometimes, in conversations with others, I hear them say with complete confidence stuff that I know is total crap. It's like I just can't get over how absolutely wrong they are and yet how absolutely right they believe they are. So I start wondering how many times I do exactly the same thing. I mean, how can I know what I don't know? How much is there? How do I even know if something I really believe is true or not?…
This happens to me quite often but if I think a bit about it, I'm not 100% sure either why they're completely wrong. If you want to get into the conversation (not recommended as it gets ugly quite often when people are completely sure of something * caugh...republicans... caugh*) it's actually better to argue on why they're wrong to be COMPLETELY sure rather than argue the opposite point you might think is right. The…
The problem is that its the most cock-sure on either side that get into the intractable arguments with each other, or worse, rush into action so sure that they are correct that they never even consider the unintended consequences.
Sadly, it also makes them much more likely to be elected.
Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - Douglas Adams
Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#47Edit: Or who knows, maybe I don't know that we don't know when enough research is enough.
Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#48Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#49Re: No One Knows What the F*** They're Doing (or "The 3 Types of Knowledge")
#50Personally, all I could think about after reading this article was the song Colors of the Wind from Pocahontas : You think I'm an ignorant savage And you've been so many places I guess it must be so But still I cannot see If the savage one is me How can there be so much that you don't know You don't know ... But if you walk the footsteps of a stranger You'll learn things you never knew you never knew That seems to pr…