Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least on that OS it can be installed in a straightforward way. If one really wants to install skype on a 64 bits debian, they need to apply loads of tricks (and risk to bork their system in the process). Last time I attempted that, the package installer prompted me to first uninstall X - the window system - (amongst a whole lot of other crucial software) as incompatible dependencies...
That seems to be a Debian packaging issue, since all you need to run skype are the 32-bit libs it uses. I run it on Arch with no problem.
Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
471–480 of 483 posts
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#472Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are trying hard now to brink Hangouts back from the brink.
Are they? What have the done recently that made Hangouts better?
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#473Earlier quoted context omitted.
Linphone (VoIP) works beautifully, is free software and is cross-platform (also works on android). It's also lightweight and personally I find the quality of calls to be superior to Skype.
The last time I used this tool (two years ago, I think), it was quite problematic to have it running. I was not able to find a suitable tutorial for it. Was this problem fixed nowadays?
What kind of problems did you have? Usually its just a matter of installing it, (optionally) make an account on the Linphone site and get it running.
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#474Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#475Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like my car's automatic seatbelts (91 Saturn) I can't find a replacement "modern" car.
Are you kidding? Automatic seatbelts are incredibly stupid, and are provably bad. The only reason they were invented was because the federal government required cars to have "passive safety devices" installed, and they were aiming for airbags. But lots of shitty car companies like Saturn were too cheap to install airbags so they installed mousebelts instead. The whole problem with them is that they're dangerous as he…
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#476Earlier quoted context omitted.
Completely off topic but thank you ! I was starting C programming and I was wondering how to check an executable dependencies. If I were to package an executable which was dynamically linked to use it on another computer without recompiling binaries, how could I proceed ? does ldd show the dependencies of the dependencies too ? Would it be sufficient to put all shared libraries into the same folder as the executable…
I think ldd should show this, not sure though. And you can't just put them in the same folder, the thing you want to look up is LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#477Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course LTE and HTML video is better :p Having so many apps constantly spitting unnecessary data out to trackers and heaven knows what isn't better. Neither is simple apps that can't cope when you go out of data coverage, which seems to be becoming more common. I'd rather have gnome 2 than 3, I'd rather have Win 7 than 10 or XP. I don't consider any of them the pinnacle of design, but I don't think they're currentl…
Just because software isn't moving in a way that you personally want doesn't mean it's wrong or that it was objectively "better" before. We don't have apps that work offline? Maybe look around more. FFS half of the web apps i use work fine offline. And claiming that there has been no innovation in the OS space for years is silly. There is plenty of innovation, it's just that people don't like change and will instantl…
It's not change that people don't like, it's the mountains of randomly missing features, settings and control remotely subverted away from the system owner, tons of software no longer working, a terrible UI nobody asked for. Who wants 10 steps of innovation forward if it comes bundled with 1,000 undocumented steps backward?
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#478Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand why people on HN are still recommending Telegram. It's not open, the crypto is highly questionable, and messages are not encrypted end-to-end by default (and not at all in groups). Use one of the apps that gets a full score in the EFF's Secure Messaging Scorecard [1], like Signal. [1] https://www.eff.org/secure-messaging-scorecard
> like Signal Or ...Telegram (search in that page for "Telegram (secret chats)")
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#479Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? Management changes, engineers change, everything changes. Saying "No" just because it's Microsoft is incredibly short-sighted. And even if it were so: the product as it is today was mostly developed while it wasn't even under Microsoft.
No, it isn't short-sighted. On the contrary it is a matter of letting Microsoft earn their trust again at a reasonable pace after almost two decades of systematic abuse. The Halloween documents where published 1998 and it is only the last year or so since they've begun dipping their toes in open source waters. They've thoroughly earned their shame. Besides, even if everyone at Microsoft has changed attitude that's no…
Re: Dear Skype/Microsoft: Problems with Linux client
#480My biggest disappointment with the business version the fact that it is impossible to turn off the pop up notification when somebody logs in or out from Skype. Before you post me URL from the support website, non of them works, everybody in the office (10+ engineers) tried to disable this but no success. The only way you block that is to put yourself into do not disturb mode, but than non of the legitimate notificati…
If that's Skype For Business, you've got somebody who set it up in a really bizarre way. It's such a clusterfuck of policies and settings that I'm not sure just where that would be set or what powershell gods you have to worship to straighten it out, but that's not the default out-of-the-box behavior. The client is trash, though. Never understood why you can't run multiple accounts, or at least multiple instances wit…