Why GNU Emacs?
elephly.net
Why GNU Emacs?
1–10 of 317 posts
Re: Why GNU Emacs?
#2Re: Why GNU Emacs?
#3[1] http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/what-are-the-pro...
Re: Why GNU Emacs?
#4Different people like different things, OK? A 40 year old flamewar is boring and old. Just let it die. [1] http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/what-are-the-pro...
Re: Why GNU Emacs?
#5Different people like different things, OK? A 40 year old flamewar is boring and old. Just let it die. [1] http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/what-are-the-pro...
Re: Why GNU Emacs?
#6"Doing just one thing and doing it well" -- which is better at this, Unix programs or Emacs functions?
Re: Why GNU Emacs?
#7Different people like different things, OK? A 40 year old flamewar is boring and old. Just let it die. [1] http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/what-are-the-pro...
I think this is a misreading of the article!
I have no interest in old flame wars. Our generation has its own set of flame wars to fight ;)
Re: Why GNU Emacs?
#8Emacs does have a great text editor, and it's Vim!
With evil-mode you can use all the Vim bindings you're used to (including sed commands with ':'), but with the added benefits (and drawbacks) of Emacs!
I've also found that fiddling with my .emacs is really fun, fiddling with .vimrc was usually quite frustrating.