Live data from Hacker News

Why GNU Emacs?

elephly.net

1–10 of 317 posts

Re: Why GNU Emacs?

#4

Different people like different things, OK? A 40 year old flamewar is boring and old. Just let it die. [1] http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/what-are-the-pro...

Can someone not write an article about a technology they love? There was no flaming in there.

Re: Why GNU Emacs?

#5

Different people like different things, OK? A 40 year old flamewar is boring and old. Just let it die. [1] http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/what-are-the-pro...

I think this is a misreading of the article!

Re: Why GNU Emacs?

#6

"Doing just one thing and doing it well" -- which is better at this, Unix programs or Emacs functions?

At least Unix programs don't suffer from dynamic scope. (Unless you use bash to glue them, of course.)

Re: Why GNU Emacs?

#7
post #5

Different people like different things, OK? A 40 year old flamewar is boring and old. Just let it die. [1] http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/what-are-the-pro...

I think this is a misreading of the article!

Indeed! I was actually raised by a pack of vims, and I like both editors. I used to use evil-mode in Emacs for a while until I reset my muscle memory by switching to dvorak.

I have no interest in old flame wars. Our generation has its own set of flame wars to fight ;)

Re: Why GNU Emacs?

#8
I enjoyed this; I moved from Vim to Emacs a couple of years ago and indeed the most important thing to recognise is this:

Emacs does have a great text editor, and it's Vim!

With evil-mode you can use all the Vim bindings you're used to (including sed commands with ':'), but with the added benefits (and drawbacks) of Emacs!

I've also found that fiddling with my .emacs is really fun, fiddling with .vimrc was usually quite frustrating.

Re: Why GNU Emacs?

#9
Emacs is a fine editor to use until you write your own. It's the only way to make your primary interactive tool work exactly the way that you think it should.
Post reply on HN