71–80 of 159 posts
Wait, where are the Windows binaries? Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
"Cross-platform" is a contextual term.
Ok so I know of and have tried top, atop, htop, ntop. What else is out there??
Ok so I know of and have tried top, atop, htop, ntop. What else is out there??
Huge htop fan. Honestly probably my favorite unix utility. Just did `brew update && brew upgrade` but not seeing an htop update. I am still running htop 0.8.2.8 via brew. Also tried on an AWS server running Ubuntu, same thing `apt-get update && apt-get upgrade` no new htop version available. Running htop 1.0.2.
[0] https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=...
I think htop and lua are probably the two main Brazilian contributions to the open source community.
I think htop and lua are probably the two main Brazilian contributions to the open source community.
Wait, where are the Windows binaries? Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
Wait, where are the Windows binaries? Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
"Until it supports MY specific OS, it's not cross-platform, wah wah wah!" In this way, there is no cross-platform program at all, because there's always something that's not supported. How is Windows a measuring-stick of compatibility for UNIXlike tools? (And why would this ever be useful on Windows, which has completely different way of managing processes?)