61–70 of 159 posts
One of the applications that they tried to port directly to before the emulation layer was htop, and he has a good rant about what that took because of its use of /proc and how that made porting it very difficult.
Given that, I'm sure this wasn't easy. Kudos!
Wouldn't braille characters also make nicer progress bars? I think they look more dense then a bunch of ||||
[::::::::.... ]
[::::::::::...... ]
Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
Still no Windows though.
Haha everyone used to mock MS because cross platform to them meant Win16 AND Win32. Now we use it to mean various flavours of Linux. Progress?
That's not progress, it's just faulty marketing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there a quick way to avoid having all those cores take up the top 32 lines of the screen? Checking my 40 core machine in a typical terminal window, I can't see any of the processes, just 40 lines of CPU! Thanks.
If you press F2 you can change the setup for the top meters and switch it out with CPU average or other combinations of cores.
Hm. Given the opacity of that config file, I went the way "configure interactively, then roll out the new .htoprc"
Wait, where are the Windows binaries? Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
Wait, where are the Windows binaries? Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
it is a big news - it really is cross-platform - OS X version was really outdated
Wait, where are the Windows binaries? Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
Wait, where are the Windows binaries? Oh, I see. They trying to be smart and say "cross-platform" because now it runs on more Linux distros. That's not smart, that's faulty marketing. And AFAIK it already was running on 90% of Linux and also on MacOS.
it is a big news - it really is cross-platform - OS X version was really outdated