Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which says a lot about our political discourse. "Rich by the standards of where" the author came from is arguably just middle class, but the author's family probably doesn't see themselves as poor and would balk at characterizing the author as only middle class. Meanwhile, the author can't even afford a house where s/he lives which calls into my question my characterization of that salary as even qualifying as a midd…
> the author's family probably doesn't see themselves as poor I suspect a single mother making minimum wage would most definitely recognize that she's poor. > and would balk at characterizing the author as only middle class. This is probably true. Middle class is so inconsistently defined, though, that it's hard to have a meaningful conversation about what constitutes middle class. > Meanwhile, the author can't even…
From what I've observed, it seems to be based on what feels normative to their social groups. If most of the people you know make minimum wage or close to it, it feels normal, and therefore you're strongly motivated to believe that's what middle class is.
As for $71k median income in SF, I would not personally define that as middle class. To me, middle class is the capability to own at least a modest home and have significant ability to save for retirement. You can't do that on $71k in SF. As such, I would characterize the majority of SF residents as being less than middle class.