Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

spacex.com

161–170 of 444 posts

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#161

Planetary landing is so hot this year! We've got Space Engineers, Elite: Dangerous, Star Citizen, and now SpaceX!

Don't forget about the Kerbal Space Program!

(And if you're interested, search YouTube for many, many attempts to simulate what SpaceX did in KSP, including barge landing attempts.)

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a vague feeling he's being snide to pay Elon back for those mildly snarky tweets back when Blue Origin landed their rocket. EDIT: Musk: "Congrats to Jeff Bezos and the BO team for achieving VTOL on their booster" Musk: "It is, however, important to clear up the difference between "space" and "orbit", as described well by https://what-if.xkcd.com/58/" http://money.cnn.com/2015/11/24/news/companies/elon-musk-jef…

Actually, thinking about it, if they staged a faux-rivalry, it would probably get more public interest in space. People can choose their team and have someone to root for and someone to hate.

They've been in a hiring war for talent too though, lending weight to a genuine rivalry.

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#163
post #148
post #125

Interesting - something flaming separated from the first stage as it landed. You can see it separate, hit the ground, and burn as the landing completes. https://youtu.be/O5bTbVbe4e4?t=2518

I don't see what you're seeing. There are lights surrounding the landing pad. Are you talking about those?

Could be a figment of my imagination - a normal flaring of the rocket flame + a light.

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#165
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This time, with a much bigger landing area. The maneuvering to land on their landing barge was kind of extreme the last time they tried it.

Thank you, I didn't know they had upgraded. I still remember the tiny RCS thruster trying to get the rocket upright from the last landing...

It was really Scott Manley landing it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRsufOoNOIQ

;).

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The satellites themselves usually have small thrusters but I'm not sure what kind of orbital change the can effect, usually they are there for detailed maneuvering and to boost the satellite to a slightly higher orbit as it decays. When it runs out of fuel it dies so you'd try to use as little of that as possible during launch.

Even a small difference in orbits adds up over time. You don't need much fuel for orbital adjustments, as long as you're staying in the same plane. Say one satellite's orbit is a bit smaller. That means that, over time, they will naturally drift farther and farther apart, until they end up on different sides of the globe. At that point, just raise the smaller orbit slightly. Kerbal Space Program is really good for un…

You just described the way I launched my first comms network constellation[0] - basically loaded a whole bunch of satellites on a single rocket and deployed them on slightly different orbits, so that they'll spread themselves out as the time goes.

Only mid-launch I figured out I could just put three of them on Kerbisynchronous Equatorial Orbit at 120° phase difference :/.

Yes, KSP is absolutely amazing for learning this stuff :).

[0] - useful if you're playing with RemoteTech mod, which prevents you from operating unmanned spacecraft if they don't have a radio connection back to a proper command centre.

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Neat :) So they do their own placement. Nasty stuff, hydrazine. F16's use it as emergency fuel.

But you can use it to grow space potatoes! :).

After it chemically burns and then ignites you, yes.

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#168
This is so exciting. Not quite a moon landing, but still feels like watching a significant moment in history.

Does anyone know what specifically changed to allow a landing attempt on land as opposed to barge? Was it just that they gained enough confidence with the barges that they would at least be able to hit the target (and not crash into a building or something), or was some regulatory clearance received or something? Or something about this launch (ie lighter payload?) made a return to land feasible?

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#169

Youtube link for people for whom livestream videos won't work. (I believe the embedded player is livestream). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5bTbVbe4e4

Thanks! Here's the link about 9 minutes in when it begins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5bTbVbe4e4#t=9m20s

Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]

#170

I join in congratulating SpaceX for this awesome achievement. It's like, holy fuck, they landed the rocket AND deployed 11 satellites, all in a single Pomodoro! I also want to commend them for a few minor things: - a real-time stream from landing (as opposed to holding it and releasing footage few days later, as before) - a real-time stream from satellite deployment, with a camera placed so that we could see everythi…

AIUI from /r/spacex last time, the reason we didn't have live video from the barges is that they simply did not have live video from the barges. They didn't have the bandwidth for it that far out to sea. If they could have provided it, they presumably would have. After all, they released the video of the Falcon Punch afterwards, and had this one blown up it would have done so live.

But they really upped the PR game this time, that's for sure. I assume somebody must have had a look at the viewer count numbers from the last few and put 2 and 2 together on the opportunity they were missing out on. A nice job of it overall.

Post reply on HN