Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is that the former means the free hardware likely goes to the production company and is not available for personal use. It's not a moral quibble, but a question of who owns the stuff and who gets to use it.
Apple gives desirable stuff to the production company. Who gets the stuff when the filming has finished?
UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own
131–138 of 138 posts
Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple gives desirable stuff to the production company. Who gets the stuff when the filming has finished?
I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?
Isn't that how hollywood accounting works?
Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?
Yes, I'm saying that employees would keep it. Isn't that how hollywood accounting works?
Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple gives desirable stuff to the production company. Who gets the stuff when the filming has finished?
I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?
Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
First concentrate on stopping the fascist coup d'etat, i.e. winning the Spanish Civil War and preventing 40 years of fascist dictatorship, then discuss about the kind of new society you want.
So knock over the government without any idea of what to replace it with? That doesn't have a great track record either, historically. (Wait, are we still talking about "communists and anarchists" in general, or is it just the Spanish Civil War now?)
Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?
Companies sell equipment they don't need to their employees at seriously reduced price.
Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
The UK is bringing some copyright law in line with the EU, eg they just ruled that reproductions of out of copyright pictures do not create a new copyright, unlike what some museums like to tell you. This might be related, certainly design is more protected in eg France than in the UK, not sure though.
> they just ruled that reproductions of out of copyright pictures do not create a new copyright That's great news. Do you have a link?