Live data from Hacker News

UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

arstechnica.com

131–138 of 138 posts

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#131
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference is that the former means the free hardware likely goes to the production company and is not available for personal use. It's not a moral quibble, but a question of who owns the stuff and who gets to use it.

Apple gives desirable stuff to the production company. Who gets the stuff when the filming has finished?

I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#132
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple gives desirable stuff to the production company. Who gets the stuff when the filming has finished?

I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?

Yes, I'm saying that employees would keep it.

Isn't that how hollywood accounting works?

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#133
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?

Yes, I'm saying that employees would keep it. Isn't that how hollywood accounting works?

I have no idea, but I would have thought companies would frown on expensive equipment walking out the door like that.

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#134
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple gives desirable stuff to the production company. Who gets the stuff when the filming has finished?

I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?

Companies sell equipment they don't need to their employees at seriously reduced price.

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First concentrate on stopping the fascist coup d'etat, i.e. winning the Spanish Civil War and preventing 40 years of fascist dictatorship, then discuss about the kind of new society you want.

So knock over the government without any idea of what to replace it with? That doesn't have a great track record either, historically. (Wait, are we still talking about "communists and anarchists" in general, or is it just the Spanish Civil War now?)

I was talking about the Spanish Civil War. The parent comment said "a brief period of Catalonian history amidst a civil war."

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine that the production company would keep it for their next project, or sell it to recover some money. Are you implying that this stuff is typically gifted to the employees instead?

Companies sell equipment they don't need to their employees at seriously reduced price.

Why would they sell equipment below market price?

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UK is bringing some copyright law in line with the EU, eg they just ruled that reproductions of out of copyright pictures do not create a new copyright, unlike what some museums like to tell you. This might be related, certainly design is more protected in eg France than in the UK, not sure though.

> they just ruled that reproductions of out of copyright pictures do not create a new copyright That's great news. Do you have a link?

See http://hyperallergic.com/261496/uk-affirms-that-photographs-...

Re: UK citizens may soon need licenses to photograph some stuff they already own

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Companies sell equipment they don't need to their employees at seriously reduced price.

Why would they sell equipment below market price?

Because selling takes effort.
Post reply on HN