Live data from Hacker News

Yahoo’s Engineers Move to Coding Without a QA Team

spectrum.ieee.org

1–10 of 188 posts

Re: Yahoo’s Engineers Move to Coding Without a QA Team

#7
Great. I worked for a company that didn't invest in QA, it was consistently a !@#$% mess. When you do this, the need simply shifts to the customer. I wouldn't install our software until the 4th or 5th hotfix patch was available.

Certainly, I'm an advocate of a more responsible dev team sharing the quality tasks and continuous integration too. But no QA at all? Hahah... maybe if you're a web portal that no one depends on for business-critical needs.

Edit: I guess the truth hurts.

Re: Yahoo’s Engineers Move to Coding Without a QA Team

#8
post #4

TL;DR: They fired the QA team to save money. Then they made the engineers do the QA work for no extra pay.

Well, that takes away from the other work than can do - and may incentivize them to more thoroughly check their work as they go. It could be a fairly big improvement to efficiency.

Re: Yahoo’s Engineers Move to Coding Without a QA Team

#10
post #4

TL;DR: They fired the QA team to save money. Then they made the engineers do the QA work for no extra pay.

I think that is a slightly harsh assessment. They forced the engineers to stop shipping shoddy code, so the QA team wasn't necessary in their opinion.

However I think there is probably a middle ground where your engineers deliver quality code and you also have a QA team to increase that quality even further.

Post reply on HN