Live data from Hacker News

Visual Studio Code is now open source

code.visualstudio.com

311–320 of 403 posts

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#311

Visual Studio Code does not yet support JSX, nor properly supports ES6, so it's currently unusable to modern Javascript devs. Which is a shame, because it has a lot of potential! I'll be watching this closely to see when it becomes usable in my workflow.

Dev on the Code team here. Not true. Both JSX ( http://i.imgur.com/01pAAsl.png & http://i.imgur.com/mRhOx8M.png ) and ES6 ( http://i.imgur.com/UOurihn.png ) are supported in all their glory. Note that if you are editing an ES6 project, you need to create a jsconfig.json file with at least these contents, in order to let the language services know you are doing ES6: { "compilerOptions": { "target": "ES6" } }

Hi! I'm having trouble with both of these.

https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/95 https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/81

Also can you comment on why a jsconfig.json file is needed, as opposed to some in-editor setting, or reading from the config files the user already has installed, like an .eslintrc?

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#312

I really hate how MS names things. Microsoft SQL Server, or as most people call it SQL Server. I read the title to this post as Visual Studio code is now open-source - but it's not. The product some genius called Visual Studio Code has been opened. I'm really surprised Windows isn't called Microsoft Operating System, or Operating System for short.

> I really hate how MS names things. Microsoft SQL Server, or as most people call it SQL Server. Or, worse, just "SQL", resulting in people in some enterprise environments saying things like "Are you using Oracle or SQL?"

Slap those people until they start saying MS-SQL, that's what I've always heard where I work.

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#313
post #290
post #173

I wasn't sure what to expect from VSC, especially going into it I was worried that it would just be a MS-branded, bloated version of an already-slow Atom. My expectations were completely wrong, though. VSC is not bloated or slow. It's well-made. There aren't really any negative MS-flavored conventions as far as I can tell. This isn't MS Office (which I guess has its place but has gone off the deep end, IMHO). It look…

Incidental to your point but I wouldn't characterise Office as bloated or slow. Word, Excel, and PPT 2016 are all super snappy.

The Mac versions are still pretty terrible and are missing loads of features.

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Visual Studio Code has a very modular architecture. The tool itself is written in Node.JS and web technologies, on top of Electron, and most extensions have a Javascript component. But most of the language and debugging functionality is built as out-of-process components, which means that they can be built in any technology. For example, our Typescript and Node tools are built with Node; our .NET tools are built in .…

Interesting. I have been looking for a good editor, I use Sublime now, but I want somethign a bit more modern. > The tool itself is written in Node.JS and web technologies, on top of Electron This is worrying. I think Atom is a really cool editor, and it seems to have come a long way, has a lot of great features and an awesome UI. However, it is buggy and slow as hell. It crashes and behaves unexpectedly, causing it…

Ya, Electron != Atom. Grab Code and paste that giant JSON into Code and let us know how it goes.

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If they keep it up with actions such as these, there's a good chance they'll stand to be rewarded for it. And -quickly enough- they'll go back to being the old MSFT we all knew and loathed from top to bottom, and these olive branches will vanish quicker than a pile of shaved ice on a summer day. For many of us, this isn't our first rodeo. :)

Honest question: how many people from the embrace-extend-extinguish era are still at Microsoft? Once they are all gone, and the market has shifted several times since then, you would think that era would be over for them. Or, is it just deeply engrained in their corporate culture, which lives in longer than any individual employee? I kind of doubt it but it's interesting to think about.

The computer technology world has changed a lot since then, and I expect that intelligent people at Microsoft know that the old ways won't work again.

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting. I have been looking for a good editor, I use Sublime now, but I want somethign a bit more modern. > The tool itself is written in Node.JS and web technologies, on top of Electron This is worrying. I think Atom is a really cool editor, and it seems to have come a long way, has a lot of great features and an awesome UI. However, it is buggy and slow as hell. It crashes and behaves unexpectedly, causing it…

Ya, Electron != Atom. Grab Code and paste that giant JSON into Code and let us know how it goes.

visual studio code seems way faster, pasting the object was nearly instantaneous and it looks like it has a nice set of features. also, i feel i should add, i realize electron is independent of atom, however it was developed by a github engineer previously working on nodewebkit for the github texteditor called atom. it used to be called "Atom Shell" and is in the atom/electron repo. So I was curious if this was related to electron generally, or choices made in atom.

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#317
post #173

I wasn't sure what to expect from VSC, especially going into it I was worried that it would just be a MS-branded, bloated version of an already-slow Atom. My expectations were completely wrong, though. VSC is not bloated or slow. It's well-made. There aren't really any negative MS-flavored conventions as far as I can tell. This isn't MS Office (which I guess has its place but has gone off the deep end, IMHO). It look…

Only losing market share and power has made Microsoft produce software with reasonable quality, flexibility, and interoperability. A lot of the credit for that goes to Apple's crazy climb in popularity. But at least some of it also goes to technologists involved in networking, the internet, and the web, many of whom decided never to deal with any Microsoft stuff ever again. If you knew the frustration of Microsoft's…

I remember it very differently.

It's particularly interesting that you start with 1995, since that's the year of Bill Gates's "Tidal Wave" memo. A large chunk of MS suddenly devoted itself to getting Really Good At The Internet, and within a few months produced the best web browser on the market (IE 3, the first mainstream browser to implement CSS) and the best JVM (far faster than Sun's own at the time). IE continued to be the best browser until Firefox came out. (Yes, you can argue for Seamonkey, but it took years for it to be usably stable.) Every version of IE up to and including 6.0 was more standards-compliant than the equivalent Netscape release.

I was doing all kinds of web development on both Linux and Windows NT back then. I never got used to Windows for web hosting, but I far preferred developing against MS SQL Server than any other DB, due to its features and documentation.

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Only losing market share and power has made Microsoft produce software with reasonable quality, flexibility, and interoperability. And that, in my opinion, is the way it's supposed to work. Vendor's products gettin' ya down? Not being responsive to your needs and lacking in quality? Move elsewhere! Money talks. A good kick in the ass can be a humbling experience, and a good opportunity for the open-minded. It was a…

> If they keep it up with actions such as these, there's a good chance they'll stand to be rewarded for it. And -quickly enough- they'll go back to being the old MSFT we all knew and loathed from top to bottom, and these olive branches will vanish quicker than a pile of shaved ice on a summer day. For many of us, this isn't our first rodeo. :)

Why would they go back? That strategy seemed promising in the beginning but clearly it caused massive damage to their reputation and simply doesn't work in the long term.

Re: Visual Studio Code is now open source

#320
post #213

Slightly bizarre that the requirements[1] imply that it supports OS X and Linux but not Windows 7. I understand that they're under the cosh to get people to upgrade, but still. [1] https://code.visualstudio.com/Docs/supporting/requirements

It is weird indeed. And it work quite well on Windows 7.
Post reply on HN