Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could both of you let the bodies cool down before you start rambling about what they might and might not do? There is no "prime cause" that is easy to work on, the situation is much more complicated than terrorism is the outcome of US/Western US policy. So unless your solution for the "prime cause" is glassing the middle east a large portion of asia and africa there won't be just one simple solution. Not to mention t…
Maybe I shouldn't write this but the prime cause is european war against ISIS. These people are the victims of war. So the best solution is to stop it, withdraw european armies from arabian countries, and stop welcoming refugees. Let them fight among themselves.
That's utter nonsense, there were "Palestinian" (not necessarily carried out by Palestinians, in fact most of them were carried by left wing europeans who used that as a justification) terror attacks in Europe in the 70's when Israel was under a trade embargo by most European countries.
Also for the most part there are no European armies in Arab countries, Europe has barely any armies to speak off yet alone to deploy in force overseas.
Even if you completely isolate yourself you will still be under their crosshairs doesn't matter if it's for bombing Syria or for building schools in Afghanistan and Pakistan that dare to teach girls.
As for the refugees and near eastern and north African migrants that ship has sailed long ago, even if Europe doesn't take a single person now it still needs to find a way to solve it's own internal problem, Europe has utterly failed to assimilate any immigration from near east and African countries since WW2, even the enlightened Nordic states are rife with patronizing racism which prevents any true assimilation and the neo-liberal ideas that some how mandate that migrants should preserve their own culture at any costs aggravates that issue even further.