Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would argue that the ICC is something that seriously diminishes the Constitution, as the courts have applied such tortured logic so as to allow the federal government to regulate virtually anything.
I personally think the Constitution should be thrown out and start over. It's an archaic document reflecting a radically different society. Some love to treat it as sacred, but if it's so sacred how come we've had to amend it so much? Though come to think of it I wouldn't mind a few amendments to the Bible and Koran.
Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
21–30 of 143 posts
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#22>"In a 4-1 ruling, the court found that prohibitions on using marijuana violated the 'right to the free development of personality'" Perhaps that is out of context, and I don't know their constitution as a whole, but I am not finding a lot of sense in that sentence. If drug use can be considered a "right to the free development of personality", then how else could America's "right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of…
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#23Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#24Not to sound cynical, but (even if marijuana was legal to grow and consume) what's to stop a cartel from simply threatening the lives of anyone else who grows it?
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#25Not to sound cynical, but (even if marijuana was legal to grow and consume) what's to stop a cartel from simply threatening the lives of anyone else who grows it?
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#26Not to sound cynical, but (even if marijuana was legal to grow and consume) what's to stop a cartel from simply threatening the lives of anyone else who grows it?
The same that stops the mafia from threatening anybody who brews beer or distills liquor: the target can now call the cops.
Large corporate interests could leverage legit logistical infrastructure and take over, plus large corporations are rich and connected enough to get the police to actually enforce the law for them against threats.
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#27Not to sound cynical, but (even if marijuana was legal to grow and consume) what's to stop a cartel from simply threatening the lives of anyone else who grows it?
What's to stop a cartel from doing the same for corn growers?
[1] http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/mexican-drug-cartel-behind-incr...
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#28Not to sound cynical, but (even if marijuana was legal to grow and consume) what's to stop a cartel from simply threatening the lives of anyone else who grows it?
The same that stops the mafia from threatening anybody who brews beer or distills liquor: the target can now call the cops.
[1] http://time.com/3490853/mexico-massacre-students-police-cart...
Edit: Downvoters, I would love to hear why I am wrong. I only know what I read about Mexican law enforcement, no personal experience dealing with them.
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#29Not to sound cynical, but (even if marijuana was legal to grow and consume) what's to stop a cartel from simply threatening the lives of anyone else who grows it?
What's to stop a cartel from doing the same for corn growers?
Re: Mexico supreme court rules ban on marijuana use unconstitutional
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I personally think the Constitution should be thrown out and start over. It's an archaic document reflecting a radically different society. Some love to treat it as sacred, but if it's so sacred how come we've had to amend it so much? Though come to think of it I wouldn't mind a few amendments to the Bible and Koran.
I always wondered why amendments weren't MORE common.