Hacker Who Sent Me Heroin Faces Charges in U.S

Post by comrh » Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 4:09 AM UTC

data_spy wrote: post #52

comrh wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Read through Kreb's archive, he has screenshots and more info. If I remember correctly one was on the clearnet but required some sort of verification before you got access.

I've been a fan of Krebs for a while. He get's a lot of access and information from other hackers (that were pissed at another hacker) or security analysts. Gotta give him props though, he taught himself a lot, including learning Russian

Post by tptacek » Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 4:57 PM UTC

GPGPU wrote: post #47

klodolph wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a common misconception. The fourth amendment only limits the actions of the state, and case law establishes how evidence is excluded from trials. So, if I break into my neighbor's house and find child porn on his computer, that evidence is admissible in court. But if the police break into my neighbor's house without a warrant and search his computer, it isn't admissible, because it's a fourth amendment violat…

People have been arrested when burglars stole their computer and claimed to have found "child porn" on it. http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/06/us/california-robbery-porn-bus... 4th amendment or not, you'd think that the "rules of evidence" and the word of a burglar would lend credence to the explanation that the burglar planted it to make himself seem more respectable in the eyes of the court. It's outrageous in this case,…

Post by thaumasiotes » Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 8:40 PM UTC

wglb wrote: post #81

thaumasiotes wrote: post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This sounds like advice never to begin farming.

As a farm boy who grew up on a wheat farm, at the end of the season after harvesting the wheat that we had "brought up" in the spring or the previous winter, we would plow the remainder under, bringing it down again.

Post by snowwrestler » Wed, Oct 21, 2015, 4:57 PM UTC

Jemmeh wrote: post #24

rubbingalcohol wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt it, this isn't a drug cartel kingpin or mafia don we're talking about. He's just a troll.

These criminals are not stealing all these credit cards for fun. It's to make money. They have money. Obviously they can throw $200 at someone just to troll him. They could pull together more if they really decided it was necessary. Money talks.