Am I the only one who think it's perfectly logical that the speaker ratio is the same as the ratio of the tech population? Of course we should try hard to find minority speakers just to be proactive since we do have a diversty problem. However, when you go to a conference you want to see the best speakers and then it's only logical that a minority is less represented since, you know, there are less good speakers to c…
I am so tired of this sort of fantasy catastrophe based on a fantasy exaggeration of of a reasonable point.
If your question is, "What would happen if we reversed the polarity on the diversity-suppression machine and suddenly conferences were as diverse as they had been previously vanilla?" then the answer is: the conference would be about the same, but with a different set of speakers.
Heck, let's try it. The industry has been unusually straight white male for, what, 30 years? [1] Let's try 30 years of conferences that are exactly as biased but in the opposite direction. In fact, let's just try 3 years and see how it goes. My guess: lots of good conferences and a much more diverse set of people joining the field and not quitting the field because they're tired of dealing with bias.
> I wouldn't go to such a conference since the probability of bad talks would be too high.
You understand, don't you, that your implicit assumption here is that there just aren't enough competent non-straight-white-dude speakers to fill out a conference list?
In my experience, the conferences that work really hard on diversity are better. Why? Because to get a diverse speaker base, you have to work really hard on outreach. You're going out beyond the usual suspects. You're finding people who wanted to speak but had never got a shot. You're finding the people who never even thought about speaking but would be great.
[1] http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/21/357629765/when-...