Interesting tidbit: If you try to refer to this article with a link on Facebook, they will block you from posting it.
EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
21–30 of 80 posts
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#22Interesting tidbit: If you try to refer to this article with a link on Facebook, they will block you from posting it.
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#23So even if data protection rules were perfectly adequate in every single country on this planet, there would still be justified concern about transferring data across borders.
That's a situation that must change, and it can change without taking away the bowl of sweets from security agencies altogether (which will never happen).
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#24In general, this is a very good thing. The main outcome will be that more engineers will be needed to do more work to ensure that data is handled more carefully. The cost will be slightly reduced profits at companies that handle large volumes of data globally. What's bad about that?
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
If those companies can't remain profitable without being irresponsible with sensitive private data then maybe they shouldn't exist at all.
This isn't just an impediment to businesses that deal in selling "sensitive private data". It's an impediment to any business that has any data about its customers (e.g. delivery addresses). Unless I'm misunderstanding it?
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#26I think there's a bit of a rush to panic about data balkanisation here; remember, this is not a ruling that applies directly to Facebook, but to the information commissioner of Ireland. There's no new policy and no court orders to do particular things. What's likely to happen is an extensive legal limbo. We may even end up with a special Snowden version of the cookie warning: "Data stored on this system is subject to…
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#27Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#28Interesting tidbit: If you try to refer to this article with a link on Facebook, they will block you from posting it.
Very intresting. This is what I've got when trying to post it on facebook: You can't post this because it has a blocked link The content you're trying to share includes a link that our security systems detected to be unsafe: http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-partys-over-eu... Please remove this link to continue. If you think you're seeing this by mistake, please let us know.
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#29Question: If Facebook manages data within Europe, what are the safeguards in place to ensure that there won't be mass surveillance, e.g. face recognition, shadow profiles, friend graph browsing?
Re: EU data protection law after the Safe Harbour judgment
#30I think there's a bit of a rush to panic about data balkanisation here; remember, this is not a ruling that applies directly to Facebook, but to the information commissioner of Ireland. There's no new policy and no court orders to do particular things. What's likely to happen is an extensive legal limbo. We may even end up with a special Snowden version of the cookie warning: "Data stored on this system is subject to…
Depends. The courts might rule that that sort of "click-through" agreement is invalid and doesn't count as consent.
Update: Already happening. DPA of Schleswig Holstein: Transfer on the basis of Model Clauses unlawful. from https://twitter.com/CarloPiltz/status/654214641975984128