Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

bloomberg.com

531–540 of 545 posts

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#531
post #382

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even on just middle-of-the-road household goods, ignoring weekly sales, Amazon doesn't seem very competitive with brick-and-mortar stores for staple goods, or at least those I buy. I occasionally run down a list of stuff I typically buy at Walmart (shampoo, detergent, OTC drugs, sponges, that kind of thing) to see if any of it has gotten competitive on Amazon, and it usually ends up being way more, not just 5% more o…

Interesting. Just a couple of days ago, I compared some kitchen cleaning supplies at my local Target to Amazon and found Amazon quite a bit cheaper. I wonder if it's a matter of regional variation, where Amazon just isn't pricing competitively for your local market and Walmart is.

Probably very much the case- I live in one of the most expensive metro regions in the US so unless I drive a ways out of town to a Walmart things are marked up pretty far.

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#532

This is a trojan horse PR move to expose Apple's longstanding "customer confusion" argument for excluding competitive products (think Amazon MP3 downloads) from the App Store. If what Apple has been doing for years is legal, so is this, and Apple can't complain without exposing complete hypocrisy. In my view, Amazon wants to be forced back from this position in a precedent-setting way. This is Jeff Bezos's long-shot…

I don't understand. Amazon Music IS on the app store: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/amazon-music-with-prime-musi...

Is Amazon Music (streaming) the same as Amazon MP3 (selling downloads)?

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#533

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For example, it still isn't possible to create a YouTube channel without Google Plus.

Get over it already, single signon is here to stay a n d it is (now) easy to create a bunch of different "pages"-identities that are hard to trace back to your main account. Or am I wrong?

Here is what I am referring to:

>> So in the coming months, a Google Account will be all you’ll need to share content, communicate with contacts, create a YouTube channel and more, all across Google. YouTube will be one of the first products to make this change, and you can learn more on their blog. As always, your underlying Google Account won’t be searchable or followable, unlike public Google+ profiles. And for people who already created Google+ profiles but don’t plan to use Google+ itself, we’ll offer better options for managing and removing those public profiles.

https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/everything-in-its-ri...

This was published on July 27, 2015

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#534

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be so easy for Amazon to support Chromecast. Instead they're losing me as a Prime customer.

I don't get it.

When my subscription expires, I won't get it anymore, either.

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#535
post #90

Does that mean that it is Google and Apple that don't want to implement Amazon Prime on their devices? and not the other way around

You should read the article to find out!

"Amazon probably wants to teach Apple and Google a lesson about not making their devices more compatible," Grunes said.

(Allen Grunes, a lawyer at Konkurrenz Group in Washington)

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#536

This is a trojan horse PR move to expose Apple's longstanding "customer confusion" argument for excluding competitive products (think Amazon MP3 downloads) from the App Store. If what Apple has been doing for years is legal, so is this, and Apple can't complain without exposing complete hypocrisy. In my view, Amazon wants to be forced back from this position in a precedent-setting way. This is Jeff Bezos's long-shot…

Apple doesn't have a monopoly or a market commanding position. Amazon does.

To whoever downvoted that:

Samsung vs Apple Market share: 2015Q2 21.4% 13.9%

Amazon compared to the next largest online retailers: http://regmedia.co.uk/2013/08/29/amazon_chart.jpg (Selling more than the next 12 competitors combined. By a lot.)

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#537

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being forced to sell something is quite a bit of moral distance away from being forced to allow anyone to set up a stall in your bazaar, regardless of the products they may be selling from it. If I wanted to buy a Confederate battle flag, it shouldn't be any more difficult for me to do so than buying a 50-star US stars and stripes flag, or a pirate jolly roger flag, or a UK union jack flag, or a North Korean flag, or…

> If I wanted to buy a Confederate battle flag, it shouldn't be any more difficult for me to do so than buying a 50-star US stars and stripes flag Funny you don't make more apt comparisons, like a Waffen SS battle standard, or an ISIL flag.

Cherry picking. Each flag is its own thing, with its own baggage. They are, most of them, devices to convince people do horrible things without feeling personally responsible for doing them.

The French flag now is the same as the flag of the First Republic, and the one that flew over the Reign of Terror. The Turkish flag, as the flag of the Ottoman Empire, flew over the Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek genocides. The Soviet flag flew over the genocides of Cossacks, Ukrainians, and Chechens, and the mass deportations of Lithuanians, Latvians, and Estonians. The 24-star US flag "Old Glory" flew over the Trail of Tears.

If you banned a flag every time something horrible happened under it, all of our flagpoles would be empty, not just the people from the American South. But then, the next time a group wants to come together and do something horrible without bearing a burden of guilt afterward, they will just hoist an all-new flag to shield them from their shame.

Or maybe they will do something great, and share that glory through their shared standard. It has happened, at times. Digging the Suez canal. Digging the Panama canal. Landing on the Moon. Establishing institutions to support the common welfare. Building transcontinental railroads. Universal literacy campaigns. Some of those things were made possible by a manufactured sense of ideological kinship.

Let us not forget that flags are just symbols, and identifying marks, whose meanings are interpreted entirely in the eye of the beholder. The flag that is placed on Memorial Day, on the grave of a man who died under it, may look the same as one that is carried at a white supremacist rally, but only one ought to be offensive to a descendant of Confederate-owned slaves. We do not have a duty to shield others from emotional distress, by attempting to prevent the latter from being sold.

If you ban one flag, you either have to draw a line around acceptable levels of offensiveness that originated under any given flag, or you have to ban them all. Deciding where that line goes is very difficult to do fairly.

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#538
post #379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You definitely can't do this, because you don't actually know the density of what you're measuring. Depending on how the caffeine was prepared, it'll be in crystalline flakes or chunks of varying sizes and configurations. Think of it like snow. You can't tell how much water went into a given volume of snow because you don't know if you're dealing with fluffy snow, wet snow, super fine powder snow, etc.

You definitely can. You don't need exactly 200.000 mg of caffeine for it to be 1 serving. Using 2 ~100mg spoonfuls will probably get you 150-250mg of caffeine, which isn't any more or less accurate than brewed coffee, which varies wildly in caffeine content.

Interesting how they are not responding to comments like this demonstrating how wrong they are.

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#539

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And how successful was Voat? http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/07/22/freedom-on-the-centrali...

I don't think the success/failure of that specific venture has anything to do with the argument I made, but ok?

To pick the most offensive analogy possible:

You are free to start up your own competing government if you don't like how one is run.

I'm not sure how creating (more) rights that govern how governments are run will somehow result in more freedom?

Re: Amazon Will Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices

#540

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And their forcing you to install an app store shim that asks for ALL/ALL application rights is why they got booted to my "snoopy vendors only" Android profile: the one with zero human contact information. For those of us willing to put the time into it I'd love a cleaner way to containerize apps and firewall off personal information.

An Android for Work profile runs on Android's new containerization feature (derived from Knox). You'll either need a separate Apps account or use a custom Work Policy Controller[1] as a lightweight app container. I'd not be surprised if someone has built something marketable on this stack already. [1] https://developer.android.com/training/enterprise/work-polic...

Slick! I will have to try imposing a profile on something like Uber to see what happens. :-)
Post reply on HN