Live data from Hacker News

Google Nexus 5x and 6P

google.com

381–390 of 568 posts

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#381
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Only partially. OIS is still useful for video stabilization. Bigger pixels won't help there.

DxOMark has already ranked the Nexus 6P as 2nd best behind the S6 Edge. http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles

Is the S6 identical to the S6 Edge? Looks like their Edge review had some comments questioning it, and while they confirmed the cameras are the same, they never confirmed on the comment regarding many S6's shipping with inferior Samsung sensors.

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#382

As an owner of Nexus 5 I must say I'm a bit disappointed with this announcement. I was looking forwards to upgrading my almost two year old phone to Nexus 5x, but there doesn't seem to be a good reason unless Nexus 5 stops getting new Android updates. They have the same resolution, same amount of memory, same amount of storage. I don't shoot video, and I probably won't use fingerprint reader - but I do use wireless c…

So the thing is, the Nexus 5 was a near-perfect phone (especially considering it was released two years ago), and it's totally reasonable to think it's still doing the job very well -- it is. But that's a fact about the N5, not the N5X/6P. I mean, what would you want from a new phone that would show up on a spec sheet? Faster? Check, both of these are. The 808/810 aren't gigantic generational leaps over the 800, but…

I honestly wouldn't have minded if they kept the same form-factor and aesthetic with the original N5 (the one I use and love right now), and just did an internal overhaul...similar to how Apple does minor cosmetic changes, but a whole world of upgrades internally.

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#383

The placement of the fingerprint reader on the back of the phone strikes me as a bit odd. I get that they had to not copy iPhone placement, but this means you have to pickup the phone to unlock it, as opposed to just touch it. Wonder how phone cases are going to handle that placement.

Why is it odd? That's where your fingers are - the back of the phone when holding it.

I can't think of a single use case where you are using your phone without touching the front of the screen in some way, whereas I can think of plenty where you have zero need to touch the back (ie. any time you have it in a mount or on a flat surface).

Seems like a PITA.

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#384

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They announced $399 for the 16GB and $429 for the 32GB.

$379, not $399. There's an optional $69 2-year protection plan, which would cost $99 from SquareTrade. It also comes with a $50 Play Store credit. If you would've spent the money on the warranty and Play Store anyway, that makes it a $300 phone.

Wow...really do not like the forced purchase of $50 of app store credit.

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So the thing is, the Nexus 5 was a near-perfect phone (especially considering it was released two years ago), and it's totally reasonable to think it's still doing the job very well -- it is. But that's a fact about the N5, not the N5X/6P. I mean, what would you want from a new phone that would show up on a spec sheet? Faster? Check, both of these are. The 808/810 aren't gigantic generational leaps over the 800, but…

Interestingly my problems with it are exactly three things that aren't addressed in the new models: 1. The wireless charging, while seemingly a small thing, was to me a huge improvement in my experience of using the phone. The fact that I can sit down at my desk, plop the phone down, and it'll just work, and when I get up to leave I can just pull it off my desk. Removing the USB cable interaction made the phone a muc…

> 2. Lack of removable storage. Small deal but it was a nice quality of life feature.

Nexus phones never had an SD card unless you count the Nexus One. The Nexus One really needed it though, since it only had 512MB of storage. Every phone since has had enough it isn't a huge deal.

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#386
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I wonder what's coming next. 240Hz refresh rates? Don't give Samsung new ideas for spec boasting.

I'd be more than fine with investments into high refresh rate screens, a true 240Hz desktop monitor wouldn't be spec boasting it would be the dream.

We just need input methods that can keep pace with negligible delay. It would make dragging/writing so much nicer.

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#388
post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree that it's not a great idea, but I assume it has something to do with the abnormally high current that it can provide.

That's a bad assumption and doesn't make any sense.

That's also probably true, but your comment lacks some kind of explanation for people like me who actually know nothing about electrical engineering and can only make reasonable guesses.

I'd love to hear what the reason is for not offering a detachable cable ("I don't know why they wouldn't offer a detachable cable" being a completely fair answer).

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You kidding right? Maybe your have the art of taking photos with that phone down or something but pictures I take with it always seems to washed out compared to my Moto X(another bad one)

This one looks alright to me, and didn't get any comments that it was taken with a "potato": https://m.imgur.com/wzMqO8p

To be honest, to me it looks a bit noisy, washed out colors, and it must not have been taken in bright lighting because you can see some camera shake. There's also a lot of smudging in the carpet and wall textures, which makes me think that either there originally was a lot of noise before post-processing, or the noise removal software on the phone isn't very good.

Re: Google Nexus 5x and 6P

#390
The Nexus 5X is built by LG. The 6P by Huawei.

It's only been a few years since CBS/60 Minutes went on a veritable crusade[0][1] against Huawei, alleging security and espionage concerns.

However, it's been confirmed since that the modus operandi of Western intelligence has been to simply to own everything in the telecommunications sector[2][3], so it's not a large leap of logic to imagine they probably have copies of every single IC schematic and piece of software that goes into a Huawei product anyways.

By that logic, a sound conclusion might be that the 6P renders you no more or less vulnerable to Western intelligence, but perhaps far more vulnerable to Chinese intelligence?

This might not be a concern for the average user, though it's something to consider for anyone high-profile or powerful. Of course, doing anything sensitive on your smartphone is generally not a good idea to begin with, but not everyone is tech savvy (or careful). Besides, if a phone is compromised, its owner can still be tracked and recorded against their will anyways.

[0] http://www.cbsnews.com/news/huawei-probed-for-security-espio...

[1] http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/update-on-huawei/

[2] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/22/nsa-huawei-chin...

[3] http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/19/nsa-gchq-sim-...

Post reply on HN