Their conclusions are not supported by the data, the study methodology is flawed, and their "average of averages" metric would have gotten me an F from my 8th grade physics teacher.
The key methodology problem is this: "A hooked episode was defined when 70% of viewers who watched that episode went on to complete season one." What you are actually want to know is after which episode the retention curve flattens out. With their methodology they'd claim a "hooked episode" even in case show's retention followed exponential decay (constant % drop after each episode) - meaning there is no "hooked" episode at all, and retention curve never flattens out.
"Hooked episodes were first identified by country, then averaged to create the global hooked episode." This is just awful. Again, high-school physics - don't average averages. I understand what they are trying to do but this is not how you do it.
And to add insult to the injury they stuck a House of Cards spoiler in the first sentence.