Live data from Hacker News

Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

techcrunch.com

301–310 of 874 posts

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just want someone to explain the $99 stylus. What's so special about it?

It's like the $80 magsafe charger. Thing probably costs $3 to manufacture and distribute, but good luck using your macbook without one. Simple price gouging, but most customers are happy to pay.

$80 is definitely too much, but fwiw there is a difference between Apple's chargers and the $3 aftermarket competition: http://www.righto.com/2014/05/a-look-inside-ipad-chargers-pr...

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#302

The announcements today just make me hang my head in chagrin. I love Apple products. Both my wife and I only use Macbooks, we have multiple iPads, iPods, and a second generation Apple TV. I look at this iPad Pro though and I see a totally useless device. For a device at that size, weight, and cost you would be better served buying an Macbook Air. If you want a tablet form factor then you would be better served buying…

My girlfriend have me have already decided to get one so we can watch Iplayer and YouTube in bed. We already use an iPad but our number one complaint is its too small!

For $799 you could get a nice TV and an Apple TV.

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of that really matters though. It's all about the applications. If you need to run Windows software, buy a Windows machine. If the applications you depend on require iOS, buy an iPad. Other non-software features (like battery life and weight) matter as well. Price doesn't really matter though.

Lots of businesses build their own software. Do you think it's easier to deploy private software onto an iPad or a Windows machine?

If you're building your own software why pick one or the other when you can just build a web app and call it a day? When you're building a new app from scratch for your company why on earth would you go native unless you absolutely had to?

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#304
post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with the fact the the windows10/surface idea is the best for my use and purposes but... I would not call it a success, at least not commercially. The surfaces aren't selling so well atm, even after already 3 iterations.

I wonder if parent didn't mean to add a /s that statement.

Got me there.

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#305
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, it's competitive... But being competitive and "most advanced", to me, are two different things. Not knocking Safari's performance, the battery life you get from it kicks butt. Still, different. (Also, wow. Comex replied to me. Very cool.)

I mean, there's definitely a good argument that V8 is most advanced, but, for example, JSC is the only one that has the LLVM 'fourth tier', and it shows on asm.js benchmarks, where it mostly beats V8 (loses to Firefox, but that has asm.js-specific code while the others don't): http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=29&view=breakdown&suite=asm... So I think the question of "most advanced" is basically subjective. Don't get…

Well said. Thanks for the insight.

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"if you see a stylus, they blew it." - Steve Jobs, after the 2010 iPad introduction.

I just can't figure out why Jobs, and apparently lots of other people, are against adding an extra, more accurate method of interacting with a touchscreen, without removing any of its current capabilities . I'm not taking handwritten notes with my finger, get real. A stylus totally changes the range of interactions I can have with a device.

Because it adds complexity to the user experience. Most people don't need handwritten notes. How would a stylus help with their text messaging or photo taking? They're fine just pressing on the on-screen keyboard. Hell, they don't even teach cursive writing in school anymore. So, a stylus is STILL not a valid useful device for the average person.

You'll notice that they introduced this stylus for the iPad Pro, and not for the regular iPad. This stylus is for a specific pro user that actually needs a pen input.

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://developer.apple.com/programs/enterprise/ Enterprise customers can already sign their own apps for internal use.

Yeah but still sandbox restrictions no?

I suspect that Enterprise IT would prefer Sandboxing - prevents users from downloading malware.

What do you get without the sandbox?

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just want someone to explain the $99 stylus. What's so special about it?

It's like the $80 magsafe charger. Thing probably costs $3 to manufacture and distribute, but good luck using your macbook without one. Simple price gouging, but most customers are happy to pay.

Someone did a detailed comparison between the $19 Apple 500mW cube charger vs a no-name $4 lookalike. Short version: the former is an engineering marvel of efficiency, compactness, and safety ... while the latter is likely to kill someone.

You may not appreciate the "diminishing returns" of increased quality for increased price, but Apple's bottom line shows a great many do.

Re: Apple Unveils the iPad Pro

#310

no USB port to be able to easily copy files to/from seems a bit detrimental to pro usage, as well as no way to connect an external display for presentations. This said there are plenty of use cases for a larger ipad with a stylus, I am sure it will be a very successful product.

> no USB port to be able to easily copy files to/from It's networked. iCloud, Dropbox, email, etc. > as well as no way to connect an external display for presentations. All current iPads have a dongle for HDMI out. And they can output to Apple TV. Do you think they removed that for this one? Despite the cute size and gorgeous screen I still haven't found a great use for the iPad. edit: Just looked at the dongles avai…

"let's make everything a dongle"... that is to be expected from Apple ... or being completely unavailable... and stick to proprietary ports...
Post reply on HN