Live data from Hacker News

An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

cs.purdue.edu

21–30 of 66 posts

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#21
post #4

> "The most infamous event in cricket was the 1932-33 English tour of Australia " Many fans of the game would likely disagree; personally, a couple of match fixing scandals and the underarm delivery vs New Zealand were worse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkQRERykq5M

I have always wondered why we have not had a repeat of the underarm delivery [1], but just done by bowling overarm very, very slowly. As far as I know there is no rule in how fast the ball has to be bowled and if you bowled very slowly the ball would reach the batsman rolling along the ground. 1. For those that don't know the history of the underarm delivery, in a match between Australia and New Zealand the final bal…

I believe now the rule is maximum one step before it reaches the batsman

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#22
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have always wondered why we have not had a repeat of the underarm delivery [1], but just done by bowling overarm very, very slowly. As far as I know there is no rule in how fast the ball has to be bowled and if you bowled very slowly the ball would reach the batsman rolling along the ground. 1. For those that don't know the history of the underarm delivery, in a match between Australia and New Zealand the final bal…

I believe now the rule is maximum one step before it reaches the batsman

It looks to a bit complex, but in international cricket the ball can't bounce more than twice. This change was made in 2000. What I found interesting reading the wiki article on no balls is that you can still bowl underarm provided both teams agree before the match starts.

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#23
post #10

Test cricket (international matches played over five days) is a truly wonderful experience that I urge everyone to try and watch* at least once. When you try and explain that the most engaging of matches can end in a draw, after all that time, you rarely succeed on winning over sceptics, but find a friend that is willing to sit and watch for a few days and try it out. *or listen to, it's equally at home on the radio,…

Test cricket is the ONLY cricket... none of this one-day nonsense ;) Once you know the rules (easy* ) and start to understand the strategy (hard) then test cricket is fascinating and pretty exciting! * The easy rules are easy, then there about a thousand weird rules that hark back to ol' England. You take "tea" for example. Though my favourite is that if a ball is damaged or goes missing in the middle of a game, they…

My favourite weird rule is the one where the bails are already broken and the stump needs to be removed from the ground to affect a run out or stumping. Nice example here from the 2011 world cup: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXChmlp2g0Q

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#24
Cricket is a great example of where disruption created a larger pie for the incumbent. Kerry Packer popularised the One Day International at a time where the (five day) Tests were on their last legs, which in turn re-ignighted interest in the Tests.

Cricket has experienced no other disruption prior or since.

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#25

You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side thats been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out. When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and whe…

Does anyone know of a good audio recording of this quote?

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#26

You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side thats been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out. When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and whe…

Bill Bryson has a good take on it. Read http://www.wandererscricket.com/Yank_view.html in its entirety for full effect.

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#27
post #4

> "The most infamous event in cricket was the 1932-33 English tour of Australia " Many fans of the game would likely disagree; personally, a couple of match fixing scandals and the underarm delivery vs New Zealand were worse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkQRERykq5M

The underarm delivery was disgraceful. Almost as bad was those caramel fudge coloured uniforms the kiwis were wearing.

In New Zealand in the months following the underarm disgrace, my ten-year-old friends would establish the rules for our games of backyard cricket by asking, "proper bowling or Australian rules?"

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#28
post #24

Cricket is a great example of where disruption created a larger pie for the incumbent. Kerry Packer popularised the One Day International at a time where the (five day) Tests were on their last legs, which in turn re-ignighted interest in the Tests. Cricket has experienced no other disruption prior or since.

what about the latest craze T20? It's a multibillion dollar industry! Tho I am too much of a purist to watch it often, Its far more monetarily successful than the last disruption. Its tailor made for 2000s generation who dont want to sit thro a whole day to enjoy cricket

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#29
post #24

Cricket is a great example of where disruption created a larger pie for the incumbent. Kerry Packer popularised the One Day International at a time where the (five day) Tests were on their last legs, which in turn re-ignighted interest in the Tests. Cricket has experienced no other disruption prior or since.

what about the latest craze T20? It's a multibillion dollar industry! Tho I am too much of a purist to watch it often, Its far more monetarily successful than the last disruption. Its tailor made for 2000s generation who dont want to sit thro a whole day to enjoy cricket

incremental improvement

Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)

#30
post #4

> "The most infamous event in cricket was the 1932-33 English tour of Australia " Many fans of the game would likely disagree; personally, a couple of match fixing scandals and the underarm delivery vs New Zealand were worse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkQRERykq5M

I have always wondered why we have not had a repeat of the underarm delivery [1], but just done by bowling overarm very, very slowly. As far as I know there is no rule in how fast the ball has to be bowled and if you bowled very slowly the ball would reach the batsman rolling along the ground. 1. For those that don't know the history of the underarm delivery, in a match between Australia and New Zealand the final bal…

A very slow ball with no spin is very easy to hit for six, especially if you're delivering the ball with an unnatural movement so the batsman knows your intention from your arm movement.

Fast bowlers bowling towards the end of limited overs cricket and facing aggressive attacking shots actually do bowl occasional "slower balls" using their normal delivery stride to try to catch out opponents who tend to mistime shots when the ball arrives slightly later at ~70mph rather than the expected ~85mph. But you're not going to catch them out with a gentle 30mph lob down the pitch, just like a decent tennis player will not have difficulty returning an attempted drop shot serve

Post reply on HN