I came to the UK aged 10 from (the mighty) USA. Forced to play cricket at school. No f*cker told me the rules. I wish I'd' had this page back then.
An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
11–20 of 66 posts
Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#12Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#13Test cricket (international matches played over five days) is a truly wonderful experience that I urge everyone to try and watch* at least once. When you try and explain that the most engaging of matches can end in a draw, after all that time, you rarely succeed on winning over sceptics, but find a friend that is willing to sit and watch for a few days and try it out. *or listen to, it's equally at home on the radio,…
Draws can be very interestng even if the teams involved have widely different strengths.
Ties in test cricket are extremely rare. There were 2 in over 2000 tests since 1877.(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tied_Test)
Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#14> "The most infamous event in cricket was the 1932-33 English tour of Australia " Many fans of the game would likely disagree; personally, a couple of match fixing scandals and the underarm delivery vs New Zealand were worse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkQRERykq5M
Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#15I came to the UK aged 10 from (the mighty) USA. Forced to play cricket at school. No f*cker told me the rules. I wish I'd' had this page back then.
Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#16Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#17Test cricket (international matches played over five days) is a truly wonderful experience that I urge everyone to try and watch* at least once. When you try and explain that the most engaging of matches can end in a draw, after all that time, you rarely succeed on winning over sceptics, but find a friend that is willing to sit and watch for a few days and try it out. *or listen to, it's equally at home on the radio,…
Once you know the rules (easy* ) and start to understand the strategy (hard) then test cricket is fascinating and pretty exciting!
* The easy rules are easy, then there about a thousand weird rules that hark back to ol' England. You take "tea" for example. Though my favourite is that if a ball is damaged or goes missing in the middle of a game, they go down to a kind of ball library and choose other balls that would be in similar condition (ball condition is extremely important and plays a major part in game strategy). Then both team captains must decide which of the candidates should be used.
Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#18> "The most infamous event in cricket was the 1932-33 English tour of Australia " Many fans of the game would likely disagree; personally, a couple of match fixing scandals and the underarm delivery vs New Zealand were worse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkQRERykq5M
Matter of opinion, but I'm not sure the events you reference resulted in diplomatic activity... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodyline
I agree, however, that what we are discussing is a matter of opinion.
Re: An Explanation of Cricket (2009)
#19> "The most infamous event in cricket was the 1932-33 English tour of Australia " Many fans of the game would likely disagree; personally, a couple of match fixing scandals and the underarm delivery vs New Zealand were worse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkQRERykq5M
1. For those that don't know the history of the underarm delivery, in a match between Australia and New Zealand the final ball was bowled underarm so the batsman had no chance of hitting the ball over the fence for 6. This was the only way NZ could win. For historical reasons bowling underarm had been allowed, but it had not been used for more than 100 years.
Edit. There have been some changes to the rules so you can't let a ball bounce more than twice now [2]. You should be able to bowl very slowly though.