Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interestingly, the blue g favicon is still there on the front page at https://www.google.com/favicon.ico (cache is off).
nope, just cached https://www.google.com/favicon.ico?cache
Google’s look, evolved
301–310 of 447 posts
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#302This latest logo is... I don't have the right words. Looks daycare copy. Welcome to Google. We're not useful, we're safe.
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#303Re: Google’s look, evolved
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
What changes would you make to Google Maps, with a basic set of assumptions? (let's say, you can't dramatically increase the cost, you can't hurt Google revenue sources, and you have a team of ~20 engineers to work on the changes).
I'd change it back to the way it was prior to the redesigns. It used to work fine. The big problem with the current version is the almost complete absence of legible affordances. There are all kinds of buttons with logos on them that do stuff. But until you learn what they do, their functions are mysterious. Basic things like Traffic used to be obvious, one-click features. Now they're hidden in the burger menu, so at…
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#305I love it. Quite often logo redesign processes gets completely out of hand, but this was a significant improvement over the older version: Cleaner, more modern and beautiful in all its simplicity. Bravo!
I like the attention they brought to the angle/attitude of the 'e'. Never appreciated before how it has a friendlier feel.
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? That seems smart to me. How often do you use the links in that drawer? Seems better to remove all that text up top and replace with a small icon for something that is rarely used.
Ugh, you definitely do not use more multiple google services if you think that. Even today, years afterwards, I was on the phone checking my calendar and I totally lost the train of the conversation as I was hunting in that dumbass thing for the calendar. The worst part is that, yes, the top was getting stuffed, but instead of letting you choose what you wanted in your menu, they added that navigation monstrosity ins…
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
We've offered a salary twice the median for our city, plus benefits, paid transportation, 401k matching and 3-year enrollment to our profit sharing plan. It's not a pay issue as best as I can tell.
Twice the median for "the city" overall? Including waitresses, garbage men, bank tellers, etc? If a skilled surgeon (or someone 5+ years into their career at Goldman, etc) makes 4 times the median of your city, what does the median have to do with what they're worth? Sorry, not trying to be rude, but whenever I hear people saying they "can't find anyone", they still counter that they're offering enough...and yet they…
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#308I understand why Google needed to update their identity, but it feels like this logo has gone through endless committee after committee. It doesn't actually convey any brand to me, just a very safe interpretation of Material Design. That seems short-sighted to me, since an identity typically lasts much longer than a design language.
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
The new one probably not populated to all their location yet, but adding a random query string does the trick. https://www.google.com/favicon.ico?newlogo (I'm seeing a four-colors capitalize G.)
why does adding "?" work at getting a different logo? not a web guy here
This is not only applies to caching by ISP, but also includes caching by the website itself as well (some websites put proxy in front of their server to cache rarely changed portion of the site, or even using CDN.).
Re: Google’s look, evolved
#310The tilted 'e' immediately reminds me of Enron. You know: "Even the 'E' was crooked."