Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know, right? A kid thinks they're safely researching things that are important to them, but that's not at all true. Statistically, it's almost certain that a kid somewhere has been beaten because of what their parents read in that report. When we're developing new features, we have to take into account ways they'll be twisted and abused. If anyone evaluated this before its development, and they were intellectually…
[deleted]
Yes, and surveillance of their every activity is not the way to go about preventing such incidents. Parents need to be able to trust their children and allow them privacy. These incidents should be prevented by talking to children and explaining risks.
> People in this thread arguing that TOOLS shouldn't exist for parents to parent are insane.
No, they aren't insane. Parents should not have the right nor the ability to spy on every single aspect of their children's lives.
There are no circumstances where this is acceptable or ethical.
> You want parents to parents? Well sorry then they need TOOLS to do so.
No they don't. They need knowledge of parenting. Children have been parented for millenia without GPS trackers and Internet surveillance.
Tools are actively detrimental to good parenting. Maintaining complete surveillance of a child's activities destroys any trust they might have in their parents.