Amazing. Now I'm left to wonder what all these contraptions are good for. For example, why would one use something like this "Persian joint": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFoiSRWdW5E ?
Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
41–50 of 67 posts
Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#42These are amazing ! I already have a use for the limited space door at home, and I want to build the Archimedian Drive just because it is beautiful. This also says something to me about the value of human determination - a retired professor in Vietnam must be old enough to have been an adult during the American involvement in their wars, and crushing poverty their state was left in, still a professorship and a desire…
I was in the Navy when my ship picked up some refugees in a scary boat, around '77. After the rescue we sunk the boat (navigation hazard) with the forward gun.
The American company I work for now does business in Vietnam (and the rest of the world).
The world turns. Today I hope for good things to come for the people of Iran and Cuba, and at least a peaceful working relationship between those countries and America.
Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#43Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#44Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#45Seeing this leaves me incredibly dissatisfied with the state of Wikipedia. This is what it should be about. Using rich media to explain and fascinate. Instead we get 10.000 words on the history of Anime.
Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#46Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#47Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is certainly true in general. I see a niche for the mechanical solution if reliability is a primary goal and there is a (not too complex) gear that can solve your problem. About ten year ago I worked in project that designed a solar tracker. These trackers need to be cheap and reliable. Every hour an mechanic spends in a remote location is incredibly expensive and cuts into your yield very fast. Interestingly th…
I was hoping that footnote was a link to the gear, not a demo of its application. Would you happen to have that?
EDIT: I almost forgot that my old website had a page about a model I built back then. I never migrated it to the new site but it is still available[2].
[1] https://www.google.com/patents/US4585318?dq=inassignee:%22Di...
Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is certainly true in general. I see a niche for the mechanical solution if reliability is a primary goal and there is a (not too complex) gear that can solve your problem. About ten year ago I worked in project that designed a solar tracker. These trackers need to be cheap and reliable. Every hour an mechanic spends in a remote location is incredibly expensive and cuts into your yield very fast. Interestingly th…
Why are mechanical solutions more reliable than a servo ? Aren't mechanical and moving parts less reliable than electronics , in general ?
Aren't mechanical and moving parts less reliable than
electronics, in general?
I don't dare to answer this in general, maybe someone more knowledgeable can offer his or her opinion. In our case the alternatives were: 1. Simple gear and constant velocity three-phase motor[1]
2. Two axis mounting and two stepper motors.
First option has less parts and should be more reliable in theory.
That being said: I only know of commercially available solutions of the second kind. Maybe this has changed in the
last ten years, but our solution never made it to market.[1] Industrial three-phase motors are real workhorses, produced in large quantities since ages, relatively cheap and incredibly reliable.
Re: Understand 1,700 Mechanical Linkages with These Helpful Animations
#50My guess is that basic linkages like this are not patentable, even if you invent a "new" one. That could be an argument in support of not allowing patents for at least the fundamentals of computer science and programming.