Live data from Hacker News

Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

washingtonpost.com

191–200 of 209 posts

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While most if not all "concept technology" has its roots in the "we can do it, even if we don't know why we should" school of thought, I imagine this will be valuable for self driving cars. Imagine a car that can drop you off at work, drive itself to the closest robo-charger, and return to pick you up with a full charge, all without needing an attendant. Given the current limited range of EVs, tech like this will lik…

That's how we end up with inflatable bbqs. This really looks like a rich person's toy, of no practical use. Many people have talked over the years about self-driving cars dropping people off and heading home. That sounds great in terms of the number of parking spots, and might make sense in cities where parking costs more than rent, but I cannot see how doubling the number of trips can reduce traffic congestion. The…

Many people have talked over the years about self-driving cars dropping people off and heading home.

Have they? I've just seen references to cars finding nearby charging stations, not just driving themselves all the way home.

Either way, I think the more likely prospect is that people stop outright owning cars at that point. Why invest in a complete vehicle when you can just pay for a service that has a car pick you up whenever you need a ride?

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are several much simpler ways a robot car could connect itself for charging. This is just gee-whiz tech for its own sake, and it's fine for Tesla to do, don't get me wrong. But as someone who can't afford to buy a Tesla, and who wouldn't spend that kind of money on a car even if I had it, I'd rather see the R&D going into more affordable, more practical EVs that I might actually consider purchasing.

Because the people who are skilled with robotics should instead be working on chemical engineering and process management? I'm tired of seeing this fallacy of "one thing being developed means that another thing is being put on the sideline". It looks to me like Tesla have the best people on the jobs they need to be on, and just adding "more" isn't going to speed things up more than having more mothers will speed up p…

May I borrow that line? It's a great way to express a point that I frequently try to make.

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#193

Tesla cars will be self-driving soon, right? Let's call such cars 'robots'. Isn't there some convention against allowing robots to re-fuel without human intervention? Isn't such a rule in the same class as the rule against giving them the keys to the armory?

I'm just saying, in a world where self-driving cars go rouge, we're gonna want to deny them access to charging stations, and the charging snakes make it just that much harder.

I don't know, at least if the evil cars turn bright red we'll be able to spot them easily ;-)

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Robot cars don't have hands.

There are several much simpler ways a robot car could connect itself for charging. This is just gee-whiz tech for its own sake, and it's fine for Tesla to do, don't get me wrong. But as someone who can't afford to buy a Tesla, and who wouldn't spend that kind of money on a car even if I had it, I'd rather see the R&D going into more affordable, more practical EVs that I might actually consider purchasing.

  There are several much simpler ways a robot car could 
  connect itself for charging
That's a bold assertion. What's your suggestion that would be simpler than a cable driven arm like in the OP? A couple linear actuators in the base, no precision bearings.

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are several much simpler ways a robot car could connect itself for charging. This is just gee-whiz tech for its own sake, and it's fine for Tesla to do, don't get me wrong. But as someone who can't afford to buy a Tesla, and who wouldn't spend that kind of money on a car even if I had it, I'd rather see the R&D going into more affordable, more practical EVs that I might actually consider purchasing.

But that is The Tesla Master Plan. Pay for the R&D with luxury vehicles before producing more adorable ones. Build sports car Use that money to build an affordable car Use that money to build an even more affordable car While doing above, also provide zero emission electric power generation options http://www.teslamotors.com/blog/secret-tesla-motors-master-p... (August 2006)

*before producing more adorable ones"

Oops, I meant "affordable" but "adorable" works too I guess. :-)

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#198
It should be a Robot, and not Snake like, Which to me is still very unpleasant.

Some may think this is cool, but to me this isn't very user friendly.

I hope this is just a concept. Because I hate to see it in real world.

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I completely agree. I came here to say this but see you beat me to it! I might add that this could be used to park your car miles from where you live. You would simply let your car know when to pick you up and it would come to you like calling the valet at a hotel before heading out. If tesla had overnight parking garages/chargers scattered around we could use all that garage space in our houses for more activities!

That's a really interesting thought once you consider where autonomous vehicles are going with Uber and Google's self-driving vehicles. It makes a ton of sense that any such vehicle, in addition to going to pick you up, drive you around and drop you off needs to be able to park itself at home base and refuel in an automated fashion.

Yeh way cool, you don't need a driveway or garage then. It would be good to reclaim that space.

Re: Tesla unveils new car-charging robo-snake

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's funny, if that thing were simply anodized, say, a diffuse white with some blue accents, I imagine it would look far less threatening than its current "Terminator" chrome appearance.

Considering Elon Musk's public statements about the risk of advanced AI, perhaps he finds it helpful to cultivate a sense in society that "Terminator-like" AI is starting to happen now .

If that were the case, it should have a bright red LED 'eye' somewhere :)

It's about just as common as the chromed tentacles, and often co-occurs (2001, Terminator, Matrix, probably more).

Post reply on HN