Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
181–190 of 245 posts
Re: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#182Re: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#183Hello! I am the creator of Don’t Wordle. Really excited to see this took off today. I thought I would share some background about the game, some of the iterations I went through, and some of the future features I would like to add. Background: Like many others, I have been playing Wordle daily. Recently, my Wordle win streak hit 99. I was admittedly very careful with my guesses on Day 100, not wanting to ruin my stre…
Re: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#184Re: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#185It would be nice if there was a Give Up button. I got down to 30 possible words but could not for the life of me think of what they could be. I was craving that “Ohhhhh!!!!!” feeling when you see what the remaining possible words are.
edit: well, I solved it by adding a breakpoint to handleWordFinishedAnimating and printing this.state.targetWord . (The whole game is run in front-end.)
Well, yeah. That was a word.
Re: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are correct. Words with repeated letters are not a good strategy in this game.
They are a fantastic strategy, though if one happens to rob you of a lot of remaining words, you should undo it.
Re: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#187I seem to have found a bug (or the word list is drastically different from Wordle). The game says I have 3 possible words remaining, but every Wordle solver website says I only have 2 (and I only have 2 guesses remaining, so this is the difference between the game being winnable and not). The guesses I used for today were WRITE,BOODY,VOUCH,COMMA (and at this point the only two possible words are FOCAL and LOCAL, but…
Re: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
> 4. Trying to get www.dontwordle.com and dontwordle.com to take you to the same URL (either www.dontwordle.com or dontwordle.com) and still support TLS and only use the tech I mentioned above. I actually still don’t have it working perfectly. I know of a solution, but it’s overly complicated If you use Cloudfront with an S3 bucket as origin for _dontwordle.com_, just create a second Cloudfront with an S3 Bucket for…
So you can do this, but it won't support TLS to my knowledge. At least in my testing, it will work to navigate to www.dontwordle.com (you will get redirected to https://dontwordle.com ). However, if you tried navigating _directly_ to https://www.dontwordle.com , that would not work. In fact, you can try clicking on https://www.dontwordle.com right now, and it won't work :) To be fair, currently I do not have it imple…
document.location.href = https://dontwordle.comRe: Show HN: Can you lose at Wordle if you tried?
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's the whole point.
It's interesting -- I only play Wordle on hard mode, so these "restrictions" seem perfectly good and fine to me. I guess if you're not used to it they seem onerous. Though I guess to be fair Wordle doesn't force hard mode, so it seems this version shouldn't either.