Viewing profile — throw0101c
throw0101c
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 01, 2022, 9:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 9,760
- Public activity
- 2,865 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throw0101c
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48601475
> That’s an extremely rosy picture not aligned with reality. "Chart 1- History of Residual Stranded Debt & Unfunded Liability of OEFC" seems to show a decreasing number: * https://…
-
comment
Comment #48601250
Can you provide a citation for the $500B? Because Carney has mentioned federal money in that amount for projects Canada-wide that include "energy" generally, but not nuclear specif…
-
comment
Comment #48601092
> But its finances were completely underwater with no way out due to the debt from nuclear construction. The debt from nuclear construction was being paid off then , just like it i…
-
comment
Comment #48600941
> We should be arguing that cars should not have any speakers if that’s the case. Even speaking with passengers has been shown to increase traffic incidents: * https://www.scienced…
-
comment
Comment #48600839
Also Tim O'Neill of the History for Atheists weblog/channel: * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lq1ksVVeRWI * https://historyforatheists.com/2025/04/interview-dr-ada-palm... Other i…
-
comment
Comment #48600765
While most folks are aware of "the" Renaissance, there were others earlier, e.g.: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_renaissances
-
comment
Comment #48599333
Ontario nuclear is cheaper than Ontario solar and wind (Table 2): * https://fao-on.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Nuclear-Refurb... Until a few years ago it was cheaper than methan…
-
comment
Comment #48599182
Ontario Hydro did not go bankrupt. It was broken up into "constituent" components in 1998, and the a lot of the nuclear plant construction financing debt didn't fit neatly into any…
-
comment
Comment #48599173
> That's because the utility went bankrupt and its construction costs were absorbed onto the public debt. Ontario Hydro did not go bankrupt. It was broken up into "constituent" com…
-
comment
Comment #48599051
If you have a site that's approved for a nuclear power, there is overhead in getting that approval, but once you have a site you can roll through multiple reactors. It's similar to…
-
comment
Comment #48598819
> I ride with a comm system that I play media over and trying to be reflective of my past and I don’t see it. One risk is your focus going from what's on the road to what's coming …
-
comment
Comment #48598769
> I am a bit stunned reading this.. Is this a common perspective of motorcyclists? No. For example, every beginner-advice thread in /r/motorcycle has a highly-upvoted comment(s) re…
-
comment
Comment #48598676
> Agreed. Unrelated pro-tip: wearing them while riding a motorcycle. Reduces fatigue and transforms a rough experience into almost luxurious. Highly recommended. What kind of NRR r…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48598113
> My point is that we are designing solutions for time scales we haven't actually been able to test over and while we have every reason to believe our solutions will work - they mi…
-
comment
Comment #48598034
> Any video surveillance system is foiled by a simple mask. Do not under-estimate the number of thieves on the left-hand side of the bell curve: if you can deal with those that's h…
-
comment
Comment #48597643
Ontario's Financial Accountability Office, which reports to provincial parliament and is independent of the government, concluded that at least for the refurbs: > * The FAO estimat…
-
comment
Comment #48593792
> I think you mean unbelievably expensive and takes an eternity to build outside of China and Korea. Japan was able to start construction on a new nuclear reactor and have its cons…
-
comment
Comment #48593717
> No reactor has yet even reached the operating age of 60 years. That 80 years number is wholly speculative. Ontario's Bruce A site (Units 1-4) have an age of ~45 years, and has ju…
-
comment
Comment #48593663
> "Cheap nuclear" is a pipe dream that has never been realized. Not even Chinese nuclear (no environmentalists there) is anywhere near as cheap as solar. In Ontario, Canada, 50% of…
-
comment
Comment #48593606
> Do you trust that any of today's politicians will not be poor at nuclear reactor design and management? As someone who lives in Ontario, Canada, where 50% of all electricity curr…
-
comment
Comment #48593582
> I find this to be the most frustrating aspect of the nuclear discourse. The "waste problem" is technically solved (we believe, gotta wait ~10k years to know) It's not a 10k year …
-
comment
Comment #48593486
> Did waste management become a solved problem? Yes? Just have them sit in concrete casks? It's safe enough to do a 'maternity photoshoot' with: * https://xcancel.com/MadiHilly/sta…
-
comment
Comment #48590954
Then-still-independent Sun sold storage appliances, and during their development and debugging it was noticed that vibrations effected performance… by yelling at the drives: * http…
-
comment
Comment #48586745
Oracle and NetApp 'mutually dismissed' in 2010: * https://www.theregister.com/off-prem/2010/09/09/oracle-and-n... * https://www.computerworld.com/article/1585889/opinion-patent... …