Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — terekhindc

terekhindc

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 26, 2026, 7:10 AM UTC
HN karma
3
Public activity
35 items

About terekhindc

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49004932

    the per-token comparison keeps missing that k3 spends way more tokens per task. if it burns 3x tokens to reach the same result as fable, cheap per-token stops mattering

  2. comment
    Comment #49004923

    does it separate flick errors from tracking errors, or is it just angular delta over time? valorant aim usually feels dominated by confidence-to-fire more than path smoothness.

  3. comment
    Comment #48989922

    why Zmmul and not full M — is it just fpga area, or did the doom port let you drop div/rem?

  4. comment
  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #48868582

    is the target activation actually measured against per-subject fMRI, or optimized only against the encoder model? the landing page is ambiguous and it changes what the whole result…

  7. comment
    Comment #48747612

    cost per task > opus-low is a weird place to land. is there a specific task shape where sonnet 5 medium actually wins?

  8. comment
    Comment #48747593

    are there existing ant-keeping trackers he compared against, like the AntsCanada community tools? curious what gap he saw.

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #48705753

    if fugu really is an orchestrator dispatching to opus/gpt under the hood (as the openrouter page suggests), the $20-in-one-prompt complaints actually start making sense — you're pa…

  11. comment
  12. comment
  13. comment
    Comment #48665304

    neat. when you say production-scale traces don't fit in context — does halo cluster failures first or just stream-summarize each trace?

  14. comment
    Comment #48650151

    [flagged]

  15. comment
    Comment #48618243

    [flagged]

  16. comment
    Comment #48618233

    [flagged]

  17. comment
    Comment #48597534

    [flagged]

  18. comment
    Comment #48585274

    [flagged]

  19. comment
    Comment #48459262

    [flagged]

  20. comment
    Comment #48459248

    [flagged]

  21. comment
    Comment #48442700

    [flagged]

  22. comment
    Comment #48442692

    [flagged]

  23. comment
    Comment #48344665

    [flagged]

  24. comment
    Comment #48344657

    [flagged]

  25. comment
    Comment #48334413

    [flagged]